Study of the Appropriate and Inappropriate Methods of Visual Arts Education in the Primary Schools According to the Types of Multiple Intelligences

Authors

  • Atena Salehi Baladehi Shahed University
  • Aliasghar Shirazi Shahed University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v5i4.620

Keywords:

Teaching visual arts, Visual arts education, Multiple intelligences, Pre-school education, Teaching through arts, Teacher abilities.

Abstract

In the current changing world, named the era of knowledge explosion, specialists and those involved in education have been attracted finding a response to a question: what should we teach today’s students that to be useful for them in the future life? The main objective of this study is to investigate the appropriate and inappropriate methods of visual arts education in pre-school. According to the types of multiple intelligences, reaching to this goal requires careful planning, proper training and proper content selection along with talent and interests of learners along with the use of appropriate practice training and educational staff training. The research handles descriptive and analytic methods as well as academic literature. The results suggest the importance of understanding the multiple intelligences in the visual arts education.

References

Honari, Morteza (1966). Introduction to Understanding Nowruz Art and People magazine.12 (138), 71-77.

Shirvanlou, F. (2006). The Necessity of Art in the Process of Social Development, Ernest Fischer, Trans Tehran, Tous Youshij, N Divan.

Dushiri, N, (1990). Book Review: Kanizo: Collection of Stories. Niloofar Publications, First Edition.

Demirel, İrfan Nihan (2011) Contributions provided by visual arts lesson for students at secondary stage in elementary education, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 15, 2011, Pages 1972-1976.

Jane Chia, Birnie Duthie (1994). Computer-based art learning: Primary children's responses, Computers & Education, Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 197-209.

Mihai Braslasu (2015). Aspects of Didactic Communication in Primary School, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 180, Pages 497-501

Cerghit, I. (2006). Methods of Education, Polirom, Iasi

Gombrich, E. H. (2000). Concerning ‘The Science of Art’: commentary on Ramachandran and Hirstein. J. Conscious. Stud. 7, 17–27

Gardner, H. (1990). Art education and human development. Los Angeles: The Getty Centre for Education in the Arts.

Johnson, R. B. & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33 (7): 14-26.

Creswell, J. W. & Garrett, A. L. (2008). The “movement” of mixed methods research and the role of educators. South African Journal of Education, 28 (3), 321–333.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-05

How to Cite

Baladehi, A. S., & Shirazi, A. (2017). Study of the Appropriate and Inappropriate Methods of Visual Arts Education in the Primary Schools According to the Types of Multiple Intelligences. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 5(4), 501-513. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v5i4.620

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 4 (2016)

Section

Workshops & Postgraduate Studies

License

All papers licensed under Creative Commons 4.0 CC-BY. 
You are free to:
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Under the following terms:

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.