<b>Decentred Centre in John Fowles’s The Magus</b>
Keywords:
Magus, John Fowles, structuralism, post-structuralism, deconstruction, phonocentrism, logocentrism, metaphysics of presenceAbstract
Decentred Centre in John Fowles’sThe Magus
Abstract
John Fowles’ The Magus (1966) has been the focus of criticism for many years. This study regards the character of Conchis as a decentred “centre” in the structure of the novel and as in the experience of the contemporary humanity. Conchis becomes in the eyes of Nicholas an all-knowing figure, an accumulation of Western thought since the Greek civilization. He produces signs to be read as he himself becomes a body of various signs that construct him as the metaphysical centre that Western thinkers have relied upon. His narration becomes superior to Nicholas’ and he himself becomes only a narrative voice. The voice from the times of Plato has been considered as a direct expression of the thoughts in one’s mind and thus superior to writing that is permeated with the undecidability of meaning in the absence of the speaker and the addressee. In the novel, words as an endless play of metaphors take the place of voice. There is no knowable reality outside the play words or metaphors which is an endless chain of signifiers that lead to other signifiers. Every time Nicholas turns to Conchis to find the centre outside the play of the language, he finds other signifiers. Thus, Conchis as a meaning-making centre is dethroned. He is not the sole operator of the masks that divert from their presumed original target when they are read. Nicholas is just another production of the literary tradition who reads the signs only to produce other signs. Conchis in the beginning of the novel renounces fiction for science but along the course of the novel, we see that words are never reliable whether in fiction or in science.
References
Fleishman, Avrom. “The Magus of the Wizard of the West.” Journal of Modern Literature 5 1976: 297-314
Online: http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/literary-criticism/6899395/magus-wizard-west,
April 2015.
Huffaker, Robert. John Fowles. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1980.
McDaniel, Ellen: “The Magus: Fowles’s Tarot Quest,” Journal of Modern Literature, Vol. 8, No: 2, John Fowles Special Number, 1980-1981, pp. 247-260, 2011
Online: www.jstor.org/stable/3831231, 25 March 2011
Rubenstein, Roberta. “Myth, Mystery and Irony: John Fowles’s The Magus,” Contemporary Literature, 16, Summer, 1975, pp. 328-339, (Online)www.jstor.org/stable/1207406,
April 2015.
Eagleton, Terry: Literary Theory: An Introduction, London: Blackwell Publishing, 2008
Fowles, John: The Magus, London: Vintage Books, 2004
Ralph Berets, “The Magus: A Study in the Creation of a Personal Myth,” Twentieth Century Literature, Vol. 19, No: 2, April, 1973, pp. 89-90,
Online: www.jstor.org/stable/440890, 12 April 2015
Susana Onega, “Form and Meaning in The Magus,”Miscelánea, 1986, pp. 69-112,
Online: http://www.miscelaneajournal.net/images/stories/articulos/vol7/Onega7.pdf,
April 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All papers licensed under Creative Commons 4.0 CC-BY.- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.