<b>Social Mobility and Its Discontents: The Center-Periphery Cleavage of Turkey</b>
Keywords:
Center periphery cleavage, Justice and Development Party, Social mobilityAbstract
Social Mobility and Its Discontents: The Center-Periphery Cleavage of Turkey
Abstract
This study analyzes effects of the center-periphery cleavage on the relationship between state and religion in Turkey during the period of 2002 and 2012. The confrontation between center and periphery is one of the most important social cleavages underlying Turkish politics that has lasted since the late Ottoman period. This study suggests that the social cleavages between the center and the periphery are still prominent factors shaping discussions on the state’s interaction with religion. That the periphery has gained more social capital since the 1980s has fueled these discussions. In recent years, the Republican People’s Party, the armed forces, and the higher judiciary have represented the centrist coalition, while the Justice and Development Party has established itself as the main representative of the periphery. During this period, the previous elites have lost more power on the state level, a development that can be read as the conservative periphery displacing the secular center to some extent.
References
Alkan, Turker (13 June 1997). Radikal.
Bayramoglu, Ali (2006). Modernity does not Tolerate Superstition: the Religious and
Seculars in the Democratization Process. TESEV Publications: Istanbul.
Candar, Cengiz (28 June 1997). Sabah.
Carkoglu, Ali (2007). A New Electoral Victory for the ‗Pro-Islamists‘ or the ‗New
Centre-Right‘? The Justice and Development Party Phenomenon in the July 2007
Parliamentary Elections in Turkey. South European Society and Politics, 12:4, 501-519.
Carkoglu, Ali (2008). Ideology or Economic Pragmatism?: Profiling Turkish Voters in
Turkish Studies, 9:2, 317-344.
Gole, Nilufer (1997). Secularism and Islamism in Turkey: The Making of Elites and
Counter-Elites. Middle East Journal, 51:1, 46-58.
Heper, Metin (2013). Islam, Conservatism, and Democracy in Turkey: Comparing Turgut
Ozal and Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Insight Turkey, 15:2, 141-156.
Hurriyet Daily News (18 June 2013).
Kubicek, Paul (2009). The European Union and Political Cleavages in Turkey. Insight
Turkey, 11:3, 109-126.
Kuru, Ahmet T. (2013). Muslim Politics Without an ‗Islamic‘ State: Can Turkey‘s Justice
and Development Party Be a Model for Arab Islamists? Policy Briefing, Brookings Doha
Center Publications. February 2013.
Mardin, Serif (2006). Religion, Society, and Modernity in Turkey. Syracuse University
Press: New York.
Onis, Ziya (2013). Sharing Power: Turkey‘s Democratization Challenge in the Age of the
AKP Hegemony. Insight Turkey, 15:2, 103-122.
Ozbudun, Ergun (2012). Turkey‘s Search for a New Constitution. Insight Turkey, 14:1,
-50.
Rabasa, Angel and F. Stephen Larrabee (2008). The Rise of Political Islam in Turkey.
Pittsburgh: RAND Corporation.
Simmel, Georg (1957). Fashion. American Journal of Sociology, 62:1, 541-558.
Toprak, Binnaz (1981). Islam and Political Development in Turkey. Netherlands: Brill.
Warhola, James W. and Egemen B. Bezci (2010). Religion and State in Contemporary
Turkey: Recent Developments in Laiklik. Journal of Church and State, 52:3, 427-453.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All papers licensed under Creative Commons 4.0 CC-BY.- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.