<b>Social Mobility and Its Discontents: The Center-Periphery Cleavage of Turkey</b>

Authors

  • Selman YILMAZ Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi

Keywords:

Center periphery cleavage, Justice and Development Party, Social mobility

Abstract

Social Mobility and Its Discontents: The Center-Periphery Cleavage of Turkey

Abstract

This study analyzes effects of the center-periphery cleavage on the relationship between state and religion in Turkey during the period of 2002 and 2012. The confrontation between center and periphery is one of the most important social cleavages underlying Turkish politics that has lasted since the late Ottoman period. This study suggests that the social cleavages between the center and the periphery are still prominent factors shaping discussions on the state’s interaction with religion. That the periphery has gained more social capital since the 1980s has fueled these discussions. In recent years, the Republican People’s Party, the armed forces, and the higher judiciary have represented the centrist coalition, while the Justice and Development Party has established itself as the main representative of the periphery. During this period, the previous elites have lost more power on the state level, a development that can be read as the conservative periphery displacing the secular center to some extent.

Author Biography

Selman YILMAZ, Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi

University of Pittsburgh, Department of Sociology

References

Alkan, Turker (13 June 1997). Radikal.

Bayramoglu, Ali (2006). Modernity does not Tolerate Superstition: the Religious and

Seculars in the Democratization Process. TESEV Publications: Istanbul.

Candar, Cengiz (28 June 1997). Sabah.

Carkoglu, Ali (2007). A New Electoral Victory for the ‗Pro-Islamists‘ or the ‗New

Centre-Right‘? The Justice and Development Party Phenomenon in the July 2007

Parliamentary Elections in Turkey. South European Society and Politics, 12:4, 501-519.

Carkoglu, Ali (2008). Ideology or Economic Pragmatism?: Profiling Turkish Voters in

Turkish Studies, 9:2, 317-344.

Gole, Nilufer (1997). Secularism and Islamism in Turkey: The Making of Elites and

Counter-Elites. Middle East Journal, 51:1, 46-58.

Heper, Metin (2013). Islam, Conservatism, and Democracy in Turkey: Comparing Turgut

Ozal and Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Insight Turkey, 15:2, 141-156.

Hurriyet Daily News (18 June 2013).

Kubicek, Paul (2009). The European Union and Political Cleavages in Turkey. Insight

Turkey, 11:3, 109-126.

Kuru, Ahmet T. (2013). Muslim Politics Without an ‗Islamic‘ State: Can Turkey‘s Justice

and Development Party Be a Model for Arab Islamists? Policy Briefing, Brookings Doha

Center Publications. February 2013.

Mardin, Serif (2006). Religion, Society, and Modernity in Turkey. Syracuse University

Press: New York.

Onis, Ziya (2013). Sharing Power: Turkey‘s Democratization Challenge in the Age of the

AKP Hegemony. Insight Turkey, 15:2, 103-122.

Ozbudun, Ergun (2012). Turkey‘s Search for a New Constitution. Insight Turkey, 14:1,

-50.

Rabasa, Angel and F. Stephen Larrabee (2008). The Rise of Political Islam in Turkey.

Pittsburgh: RAND Corporation.

Simmel, Georg (1957). Fashion. American Journal of Sociology, 62:1, 541-558.

Toprak, Binnaz (1981). Islam and Political Development in Turkey. Netherlands: Brill.

Warhola, James W. and Egemen B. Bezci (2010). Religion and State in Contemporary

Turkey: Recent Developments in Laiklik. Journal of Church and State, 52:3, 427-453.

Published

2014-10-26

How to Cite

YILMAZ, S. (2014). <b>Social Mobility and Its Discontents: The Center-Periphery Cleavage of Turkey</b>. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 3(2), 28-44. Retrieved from http://kutaksam.karabuk.edu.tr/index.php/ilk/article/view/356

Issue

Section

Articles