Geo-policy and Geo-psychology as Cultural Determinants of Ukrainian Religion, Mentality and National Security
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i3.2761Anahtar Kelimeler:
Mentality- National consciousness- Culture- National security- Geo-policy- Geo-psychology.Özet
The interconnection between national religious, mental features and geopolitical, geo-psychological factors regarding national security is considered in the paper. The direct and indirect impact of geo-policy and geo-psychology on religious culture, world view, and mentality of the Ukrainian nation is determined. The existence of stable marginal tendencies, that are inherent in Ukrainian culture and mentality, is highlighted. The main concept of the study was formed in the following statement – the geopolitical circumstances (enhanced by the constant presence of internal territorial “borderline”) were not in favor of national unity in the Ukrainian history. The situation caused “instability” and “split” of Ukrainian being as well as national mentality displays. The marginal tendencies of Ukrainian mentality are derived from the geopolitical factor of national being. The dual nature of legal and cultural aspects is presented in the process of the national security establishment. Mental, cultural, and historical memory able to imprint every moment that is beyond legal documents’ capacity, is distinguished within the context. The abovementioned memory becomes a basis for the national security idea’s realization. The initial aim of the paper is to follow geopolitical and geo-psychological features of national, mentality, religious culture and ideas of national security through structural analysis and hermeneutic methodology; to represent the unique “borderline” of Ukrainian geopolitical, cultural, and mental being; to highlight the character and sources of marginal tendencies in Ukrainian spiritual culture. The additional goal is to demonstrate that the legal establishment of national security principles should be based on the cultural and mental factors.
Referanslar
Badzio, Yu. (2000). National Idea and National Issue. Kyiv: Flame.
Barabash, Yu. (1994). “Place Development” or Do You Know a Ukrainian Night? (National Landscape as a Mental Factor by N.V. Gogol). Journal of Philosophy and Sociology Thought, 7-8, 135-136.
Cicero, M. T. (1999). On the Republic; On the Laws; On Old Age; On Friendship; On Responsibilities; Speeches; Letters. Translated and commented by E. Liapustin. Moscow: Thought.
Grygoriiv, N. (1941). Ukrainian National Character. Winnipeg: Manitoba.
History of Ukrainian Philosophy (1993). Kyiv: Lybid.
Khrypko S., & Iatsenko G. (2019 a). Philosophy of a Name: Ukrainian Context. Beytulhikme: An International Journal of Philosophy, 9(2), 437-451. Retrieved from: http://www.beytulhikme.org/OncekiSayilarDetay.aspx?Sayi=9:2
Khrypko S., & Iatsenko G. (2019 b). Philosophy of a Surname: Ukrainian Context. Beytulhikme: An International Journal of Philosophy, 9(4), 899–912. Retrieved from: http://www.beytulhikme.org/OncekiSayilarDetay.aspx?Sayi=9:4
Kolodny, A., & Phylypovych L. (1996). Ukrainian Religious Spirituality: Manifestations, Figures, State. Lviv: Logos.
Kononenko, P. (1996). Ukrainian Studies. Kyiv: Lybid.
Kostomarov, N. (1991). Two Russian Nations. Kyiv: Maydan.
Lozko, G. (1995). Ukrainian National Studies. Kyiv: Zodiak-EKO.
Moskalets, V. (1993). Religious as a Feature of Ukrainian National Character. Journal of Philosophy and Sociology Thought, 1, 67-79.
Nikitin, Yu. (2015). National Security of Ukraine under the Modern Circumstances: Risks and Factors of Impact. Juridical Science, 2, 141-147.
Religious in Spiritual Life of the Ukrainians. (1994). Kyiv: Scientific Thought.
Rothschild, E. (1995). What is Security? Journal Dacdalus, 61-65.
Yaniv, V. (1966). Ukrainian Religious Nature from Ethnical and Psychological View. Religion in a Life of Ukrainian Nation. A Collection of Conference Materials. Munich-Paris.
Zmyr, V. (1991). On the Way to Yourself (History of Ukrainian Consciousness). Journal of Philosophy and Sociology Thought, 1, 144-162.
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Tarih Kültür ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi'nde yayımlanan tüm çalışmalar Creative Commons 4.0 CC-BY lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.
Bunları yapmakta özgürsünüz:
- Bu eseri her boyut ve formatta paylaşabilir — kopyalayabilir ve çoğaltabilirsiniz.
- Materyalden Adapte et — karıştır, aktar ve eserin üzerine inşa et
- her türlü amaç için, ticari amaç da dahil
Alttaki şartlar altında:
Atıf — uygun bilgiyi, lisansa linki, and ve değişiklik yapıldıysa değişiklik bilgisinivermelisiniz. Sizi veya kullanımınızı lisansörün onayladığı bilgisini içermemek kaydıyla, size uygun şekilde bu işlemleri gerçekleştirebilirsiniz.
AynıLisanslaPaylaş — Eğer materyali karıştırdınızsa, aktardınızsa ya da materyalin üzerine çalıştınızsa, ancak aynı lisans ile dağıtabilirsiniz.
- Ek sınırlamalar yoktur — Lisansın izin verdiği hakları başkaları üzerinde kanunlarla ya da teknolojiyikullanarak sınırlayamazsınız.