Interrelation of the Сulture and Historical Consciousness in Terms of Developing a Modern Value Paradigm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i1.2054Anahtar Kelimeler:
Cultural philosophy- Historical consciousness- Anomie- Heteronomy- Tradition.Özet
This paper reveals what foundations of the value paradigm of modern society are the most appropriate to contemporary cultural and historical realities on the basis of the study of interrelation between cultural phenomena and historical consciousness. The study employs a significant range of methodological and theoretical approaches of philosophy, cultural and social studies. The article argues that three different approaches to interrelation of culture and historical consciousness are correlated with three approaches to the establishment of the value paradigm of modern society. The author considers that the most suitable axiological basis for the establishment of the value paradigm in modern social and cultural situation is the principle of individual autonomy that will help to strike a balance of values of personalistic egoism, national and corporate altruism, and also humanistic universalism. The historical consciousness developed within this value paradigm makes it possible to overcome both an objectivist interpretation of historical path typical for classical science and a subjectivist one common to post-modern historical philosophy.
Referanslar
Chavchavadze, N. Z. (1979). External and internal forces of cultural development. Culture and social development (pp.5-32). Tbilisi: Metsniereba.
Durkheim, E. (1994). Suicide: a sociological etude. Translation from French with abbr.; edited by V.A. Bazarov. Moscow: Thought.
Ellul, J. (1995). The technological bluff. / It’s a human. Anthology (pp.265-294). Moscow: High School.
Gurevich, P. S. (2001). Philosophy of Culture: textbook for higher education institutions. Moscow: NOTA BENE Publishing House.
Lebedeva, N. Yu. & Shironina, E. M. (2012). Methodological issues of studying organizational culture. Fundamental research, 9(3), 729-733.
Meshcheryakova, N. N. (2011). Anomie as an exhibition of socio-entropic growth. Sociology of authority, 4, 83-91.
Lebedev, S. A. (eds.) (2008). Philosophy of social and human sciences. Textbook for higher education institutions (2nd ed.). Moscow: Academic Project.
Pokrovskii, N. E. & Ivanchenko, G. V. (2008). Universum of solitude: sociological and psychological essays. Moscow: Logos.
Rudenko, A. M. (2012). Socio-vital concept of the life-purpose intentionality of human existence: thesis ... by Doctor of Philosophy: 09.00.13. Rostov-on-Don.
Shchekotova, R. R. (2013). On tradition relevancy in time as a spiritual value in the aspect of the universalism methodology. Studia Culturae, 15, 224-230.
Shestakov, Yu. A. (2016). History as a force of national security in the context of O. Spengler’s history of philosophy. Economic and Humanitarian Studies of the Regions, 2, 150-155.
Vasilev, A. M. & Vasileva, A. N. (2014). Anthropological content of constructive-critical study of Western civilization. Science Time, 1(1), 14-23.
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Tarih Kültür ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi'nde yayımlanan tüm çalışmalar Creative Commons 4.0 CC-BY lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.
Bunları yapmakta özgürsünüz:
- Bu eseri her boyut ve formatta paylaşabilir — kopyalayabilir ve çoğaltabilirsiniz.
- Materyalden Adapte et — karıştır, aktar ve eserin üzerine inşa et
- her türlü amaç için, ticari amaç da dahil
Alttaki şartlar altında:
Atıf — uygun bilgiyi, lisansa linki, and ve değişiklik yapıldıysa değişiklik bilgisinivermelisiniz. Sizi veya kullanımınızı lisansörün onayladığı bilgisini içermemek kaydıyla, size uygun şekilde bu işlemleri gerçekleştirebilirsiniz.
AynıLisanslaPaylaş — Eğer materyali karıştırdınızsa, aktardınızsa ya da materyalin üzerine çalıştınızsa, ancak aynı lisans ile dağıtabilirsiniz.
- Ek sınırlamalar yoktur — Lisansın izin verdiği hakları başkaları üzerinde kanunlarla ya da teknolojiyikullanarak sınırlayamazsınız.