Legal Regulation of International Contradictions in the Modern International Migration Processes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i1.2050Keywords:
United Nations Human Rights Council, Representation of international organizations, the European Union, the EAEU, International conflicts, Migrants’ rights.Abstract
The article is devoted to the issues of legal regulation of international contradictions in the modern international migration processes. Special attention is given to the international legal acts for human rights and citizens’ protection in the sphere of international migration. The authors consider international and national legal mechanisms for the protection of migrants’ rights. New approaches to solving the problems of migrants’ rights protection under the conditions of population’s increasing mobility and globalization are offered. Special attention is paid to legal regulations of the United Nations. The authors consider the controversies associated with the adoption of the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families by the states in which the number of emigrants far exceeds the influx of arriving migrants and by the developed countries that have not signed or ratified the Convention.
References
Alexander, J. M. (2004). Capabilities, human rights and moral pluralis. International Journal of Human Rights, 8(4), 451-469.
Barkan, E. (2008). Can Human Rights Be Local. Raritan, 28(1), 135-155.
Dayway, P. S. (2010). Migrant Workers’ Rights and Status under International Law: The Asian Experience. Journal of East Asia & International Law, 3(2).
Dayway, P. S. (2010). Migrant Workers’ Rights and Status under International Law: The Asian Experience. Journal of East Asia & International Law, 3(2).
Foblets, M. C. & Vanheule, D. (2007). Instrumentalisation in the realm of (European) Migration Law. European Journal of Migration and Law, 9.
Noll, G. (2010). Why Human Rights Fail to Protect Undocumented Migrants. European Journal of Migration and Law, 12.
Ogneva, V. V. (2016). The EAEU: The controversial way to integration. Scientific Bulletin. History. Political Science, 1(37), 168-172.
Schislyaeva, E. R. (2011). Comparative management. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of Polytechnic University.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All papers licensed under Creative Commons 4.0 CC-BY.- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.