Strategies of Discourse Modeling

Elena A. Ogneva, Daria E. Nikulina, Elena N. Musaelian, Roman E. Bogachev, Alina A. Kutsenko, Ilya A. Danilenko

Özet


Contemporary discourse modeling is the complex research methodology having many scientific algorithms. Every step of this discourse modeling methodology has the specific scientific purpose. The unity of these scientific purposes is the base to identify discourse modeling evolution steps. Modeling of political discourse and TV-discourse as the most manipulative discursive types realizes so important scientific problems to create socio-cultural model of society. The discourse model of society discovers reasons and results of transformation in discourse formations. Our discourse modeling methodology is discovering the specific feature of transformation in political discourse and TV-discourse’s formations. The majority of discursive modeling strategies are based on the socio-cultural factors, and it should be noted that both the political and movie discourses are interrelated with them, and most frequently represented as cultural realities in discursive modeling. Formulation of discourse modeling strategies is one of the ways to identify the specific features of evolution’s steps onto discourse socio-cultural model`s development.


Anahtar Kelimeler


Discourse, Political discourse, TV-discourse, Socio-cultural model.

Tam Metin:

PDF (English)

Referanslar


Alefirenko, N. F. (2009). Zhivoe slovo: problemyi funktsionalnoy leksikologii: monografiya. M. Flinta: Nauka. (in Russian).

Bogachev, R. E.; Musaelian, E. N.; Miroshnichenko, L. N. & Yarygina, O. N. (2015). The Notion Interconnections of “Os-Drihten” Within One Conceptual Meaning. The Social Sciences, 10: 1135-1137.

Crowhurst, M. & Emslie, M. (2018). Discourse Analysis. In: Working Creatively with Stories and Learning Experiences. Creativity, Education and the Arts. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Dem'jankov, V. Z. (2007). Tekst i diskurs kak terminy i kak slova obydennogo jazyka. IV Mezhdunarodnaja nauchnaja konferencija «Jazyk, kul'tura, obshhestvo». Moskva. pp. 86-95. (in Russian).

Edberg, H. (2018). Text as a Site of Negotiation: A Model for Text Analysis. In: Creative Writing for Critical Thinking. Palgrave Macmillan.

Gee, J. P. (2014). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method (4th ed.). Routledge.

Jaworski, A. & Coupland, N. (Eds.) (2014). The Discourse Reader (3rd ed.). London; New York: Routledge.

Karasik, V. I. (2000). O tipah diskursa. Jazykovaja lichnost': institucional'nyj i personal'nyj diskurs: sb. nauch. tr. Volgograd: Peremena, pp. 5-20. (in Russian).

Karasik, V. I. (2000). O tipah diskursa. Jazykovaja lichnost': institucional'nyj i personal'nyj diskurs: sb. nauch. tr. Volgograd: Peremena, pp. 5-20. (in Russian).

Ogneva, E. A. (2015). Transformacija diskursivnoj modeli sociuma: problemy i perspektivy. Riski v izmenjajushhejsja social'noj real'nosti: problema prognozirovanija i upravlenija. Voronezh: OOO «PT», pp. 569-573. (in Russian).

Ogneva, E. A. (2015). Transformacija diskursivnoj modeli sociuma: problemy i perspektivy. Riski v izmenjajushhejsja social'noj real'nosti: problema prognozirovanija i upravlenija. Voronezh: OOO «PT», pp. 569-573. (in Russian).

Ogneva, E. A.; Danilenko, I. A.; Kireeva, Ya. I. & Kutsenko, A. A. (2015). Interpretative Model of Linguacultural Knowledge. The Social Sciences, 10: 1101-1106.

Reiss, T. J. (2018). The Discourse of Modernism. Cornell University Press.

Revzina, O. G. (2005). Diskurs i diskursivnye formacii. Kritika i semiotika. Vyp. 8, pp. 66-78. (in Russian).

Shevchenko, I. S. (2017). Konceptualizacija kommunikativnogo povedenija v diskurse; glava v kn. Kak narisovat' portret pticy: metodologija kognitivno-kommunikativnogo analiza jazyka: kol. Monografija. Bondarenko, E.V., Martynjuk A.P., Frolova I.E., Shevchenko, I.S., Har'kov: HNU im. V.I. Karazina. (in Russian).

Usmanova, A. R. (2001). Diskursija. Postmodernizm. Jenciklopedija. Mn.: Interpresservis. (in Russian).

Venhuizen, N. J.; Bos, J.; Hendriks, P. & Brouwer, H. (2018). Discourse Semantics with Information Structure. Journal of Semantics, 35, 127-169.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v7i2.1603

Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.




Telif Hakkı (c) 2018 Journal of History Culture and Art Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.