Philosophy as Inquiry Aimed at the Absolute Knowledge

Ekaterina Snarskaya, Artur Karimov, Alexei Guryanov, Georgij Avdoshin

Özet


Philosophy as the absolute knowledge has been studied from two different but closely related approaches: historical and logical. The first approach exposes four main stages in the history of European metaphysics that marked out types of “philosophical absolutism”: the evolution of philosophy brought to light metaphysics of being, method, morals and logic. All of them are associated with the names of Aristotle, Bacon/Descartes, Kant and Hegel. Then these forms are considered in the second approach that defined them as subject-matter of philosophy as such. Due to their overall, comprehensive character, the focus of philosophy on them justifies its claim on absoluteness as far as philosophy is aimed at comprehension of the world’s unity regardless of the philosopher’s background, values and other preferences. And that is its prerogative since no other form of consciousness lays down this kind of aim. Thus, philosophy is defined as an everlasting attempt to succeed in conceiving the world in all its multifold manifestations. This article is to try to clarify the claim of philosophy on the absolute knowledge.


Anahtar Kelimeler


Absolute knowledge, Metaphysics, Speculative philosophy, Logic, Science, Unity of the world.

Tam Metin:

PDF (English)

Referanslar


Demin, M. R. (2011). Spor ob obyeme logiki v Germanii pervoi polovini XIX v.: distsiplinarnii granitsi logicheskogo znaniya (Controversy about dimensions of logic in Germany in the first half of the XIX century: disciplinary boundaries of logical knowledge). Vestnik leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Herald of Leningrad State University), Saint-Petersburg, Univ. Press, 2(4), 170-182.

Hegel, G. W. F. (2017). The Phenomenology of Mind. Retrieved from http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/index.htm

Hegel. G. W. F. (2013). The Phenomenology of spirit. Retrieved from http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/ph/pinkard-translation-of-phenomenology.pdf

Heraclitus (1912). Fragments of Heraclitus. Retrieved from http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Fragments_of_Heraclitus

Kalinnikov, L. A. (2010). O nravotsentrichnosti transtsendentalnoi antropologii Kanta I o roli morali v prirode cheloveka (On the morals-centeredness of Kant's transcendental anthropology and on the role of morals in the human nature). Kantovskiy sbornik (Journal of Kant collection), 4, 21-33.

Kant E. (2017). Critique of pure reason. Retrieved from http://www2.hn.psu.edu/faculty/jmanis/kant/Critique-Pure-Reason.pdf

Kant, E. (1914). Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals. Retrieved from http://www.bartleby.com/32/601.html

Kasavin, I. T. & Schavelev, S. P. (2004). Analiz povsednevnosti (The analysis of everyday experience). Moscow: Kanon Publications.

Kojeve, A. (1969). Introduction to the Reading of Hegel: Lectures on the Phenomenology of Spirit. London: Cornell University Press.

Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, New-Jersey: Princeton University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i4.1150

Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.




Telif Hakkı (c) 2017 Journal of History Culture and Art Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2147-0626