Miracles Tradition and a Critique on Hume's Theory

Qasem Khanjani

Özet


Since appearing miracles and distancing them, denying or doubting Prophets' miracles and miracles tradition has had an old precedent. Although it may be imagined these oppositions have been proposed by the western philosophers and learned, but investigating the ancient sources and the past Islamic philosophers and learned we can find out that opposing these traditions has happened continuously since appearing miracles namely since the Prophets (PBUH). In modern era also some western learned, including David Hume, have embarked upon showing the miracles tradition and consequently the very miracles to be blemished and undocumented. Opposing Hume and answering his objections began during his own life and has been continued up today. In this article Hume's opinion will be studied and considering the experts' opinions in Islamic and Western world his objections will be answered.


Anahtar Kelimeler


Miracle tradition, Miracles, Historical traditions, Reasons, Encroachment, Empiricism, Hume.

Tam Metin:

PDF (English)

Referanslar


Ahmadi, Mohammad Amin (1999). The paradox or the symptom of the invisible, a new attitude to the miracle. Islamic studies and Research Center. Qom: Qom Seminary Islamic propaganda Office, The center of publishing.

Copleston, Frederick (1996). History of Philosophy, volume five: the English philosophers (from Hobbes to Hume), translation of Amir Jalal Din Alam, Tehran: Scientific and cultural publication company and publishing of Soroush.

Durant, W. A. (2005). Religion and philosophy. The history of civilization, the age of Voltaire, trans. By S. Azeri, ed. By H. Anousheh, 10th edition, publishing company.

Fathalikhani, M. (2012). Hume's philosophy of religion, Qom: Academy of school and University.

Haroni Hassani Zeidi, A. (1425) Ah, proving the prophecy of the venerable Prophet, research, A. A. Jadban, Sadeh, school of al-turath al-Islami.

Hick, John (1993). Philosophy of Religion, trans. B. Rad, international publications, Tehran: Hoda.

Hospers, John (n.d.). Philosophy of Religion (criticism on proofs of proving the existence of God by philosophical analysis method), trans. by studies and translation Group and the Islamic Research Center of Islamic propaganda Office, Qom: Islamic propaganda Office.

Khanjani, Q. (2006). A look at the proof-books in Life of Prophet. History in mirror of research, no. 11, pp. 131-156.

Mamghani, A. (1411). Ah, Measure of Guidance in Analysis of Scripture, research M. R. Mamghani, Qom: al-Bait.

Principles of Philosophy and the Method of Realism (1985). Tehran: Sadra.

Razi, Abuhatm (322 dead) (2002). Signs of Prophecy. Research. Introduction and edited by S. Sahavi, Gh. Avani, English introduction by NASR, Tehran: Iranian society of philosophy.

Sharif Ali Bin Hussein (1431). Ah, on Theology. Edited by Seyed Ahmad Hosseini, Qom: Nashr Eslami.

Tabatabai, M. H. (1983). The Quran's Miracle. Tehran: publication of Raja.

The Old Testament (the Torah), based on the Bible Jerusalem (2014). trans. by P. Sayar, Tehran: Hermes.

Thissen, Henry (n.d.). Christ Theology. trans. by T. Mikailian, Tehran: Pub. of Hayat Abadi.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i3.997

Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.




Telif Hakkı (c) 2017 Journal of History Culture and Art Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2147-0626