Comparative Study of Single-glazed and Double-glazed Windows in Terms of Energy Efficiency and Economic Expenses

Samaneh Forughian, Masoud Taheri Shahr Aiini

Özet


Saving fossil fuels and the use of clean sources of energy lead to reduce in building operating costs, protect the environment and people's health. Windows are the most vulnerable part of building where energy loss occurs. Double-glazed windows are very effective in keeping inside temperature isolated from outside; thereby, saving electrical and thermal energy. The current study estimates the numerical changes in cooling and heating load in case of replacement double-glazed window with single-glazed window and calculates saving level for this replacement. In this context, this paper presents a model of real samples taken in Mashhad climate. To ensure the accuracy of the simulation results, real results were compared with electricity and gas bills. To calculate energy related parameters such as cooling load, heating load, the consumption of gas and electricity, the energy simulation software (Design Builder) was used. The research method was a quantitative analysis based on energy consumption modeling, associated with building windows which comes in four sections. The field study was also used to compare with real electricity and gas bills. As the first stage, samples of the plan were identified, based on the observation of climate models and library studies. Then, simulation parameters such as window materials and internal and external walls were considered. The simulation was performed based software’s parameters and model limitations were determined based on thermal, lighting, climatic and architectural parameters. Finally, the experimental and practical data were used to determine the validity of the model under Mashhad climate conditions. Overall, the results indicated that double-glazed windows could save 50% of entire building loads, 0.2% on power consumption, 16.2% on gas and 12.4% on overall households’ energy consumption. 


Anahtar Kelimeler


Builder Design, Single and double-glazed window, Energy saving, Economic saving, Cooling load, Heating load.

Tam Metin:

PDF (English)

Referanslar


Azimi Hosseini, A. A. (2011). Effect of educational building orientation on heating and cooling loads in different climates. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 1(2): 78-92.

Barjastehbaf, Y. B. & Rahimi Zadeh Holaq, A. (2012). Simulates the effect of double glass to reduce energy consumption of buildings in our climate. Journal of Energy Conservation. (61):71-82.

Balance Sheet Energy / Power and Energy Affairs. Macro Planning Office of Electricity and Energy / Spring (2013).

Bodart, M. A. (2001). Global energy saving in offices building by the use of daylighting,universite Catholique de Louvain. Journal of conservation energy. (48):82-91.

DesignBuilder. (2010). DesignBuilder SBEM Approval, Available in http://www.designbuilder.com.uk/conten.

Feuermann, D. & Novoplansky, A. (1997). Reversible low solar heat gain windows for energy savings, ben-gurion University of the Negev Pub. 283 pages.

Florides, G. A. (2002). Measures used to lower building energy consumption and their cost effectiveness, Brunel University, Uxbridge Pub. 523 pp.

Hassouneh, K.; Alshboul, A. & Al-Salaymeh, A. (2010). Influence of windows on the energy balance of apartment buildings in Amman. Journal of Building Performance Simulation. (93): 567-574.

Heydari, M. (2013). Electrochromic smart glass applications in energy efficiency. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings. 11(1): 54-63.

Hussain Zadeh, S.; Giat Yeganeh, R. & Lak, A. (2013). Reviews and simulate the effects of windows in energy efficiency in buildings. Journal of Architectural Engineering. 96: 345-349.

Krarti, M. P.; M. Erickson & T. C. Hillman (2005). A Simplified method to estimate energy savings of artificial lighting use from daylighting, Building and Environment. 40: 747-754.

Qiyabkoloo, Z. (2010). Set the environmental conditions affecting data set separation. Journal of Architectural Science Review. 95: 85 – 93.

PyonchanIhm; AbderrezekNemri & MoncefKrarti, P. (2008). Estimation of lighting energy savings from daylighting, University of Colorado, Boulder. 465 pp.

Rayment, R. & Morgan, K. (1985). Energy savings from secondary windows. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. 115: 163-171.

Rijal, H. B. (2007). Using results from field surveys to predict the effect of open windows on thermal comfort and energy use in buildings, Oxford Brookes University. 387 pp.

Tommerup, H. & Svendsen, S. (2005). Energy savings in Danish residential building stock, Technical University of Denmark. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research. 94: 603-611.

Yalcın, Y. & Sibel Macka C. (2012). The effects of window alternatives on energy efficiency and building economy in high-rise residential buildings in moderate to humid climates, Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Architecture, Trabzon, Turkey.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i3.884

Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.




Telif Hakkı (c) 2017 Journal of History Culture and Art Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2147-0626