Factors Affecting the Augmentation of Spatial Dynamics in Social Sustainability with an Emphasis on Human-Orientation of Space

Authors

  • Ehsan Hanif
  • Hashem Hashemnejad
  • Mitra Ghafourian

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i1.751

Keywords:

Spatial dynamicity, Human scale, Space historical memory, Collective memory.

Abstract

A place can be considered as sustainable place that meets current needs of human and considers their needs in future. Spatial dynamicity is also one of the indices of a sustainable space, which defined the relationship of space with variable needs of human. Spatial dynamicity is an index, through which space matches itself by changes in human life over the time. In other words, special dynamicity is a quality of a space, through which space is matched with changed needs of humans through changing itself. Therefore, in regard with space dynamicity and place stability, human needs are prior to other needs. This is because; in fact meeting the needs causes more social participation of people and increase in their social interactions. However, at the current world and after expansion of modernism approach, increase in attention to vehicles and their presence has decreased direct consideration of variable needs of human and their presence in space. Hence, it could be mentioned that today, presence of vehicles in space has created a big challenge for dynamicity of space. Meeting such challenge is important, since a human-oriented dynamic space can increase human interactions and can also promote place sustainability and make using space possible over the time. This study adopts a qualitative-analytical approach to find factors that can form a sustainable space through strengthening the dynamics of space and increasing level of social interactions. Findings indicate that in regard with creating any kind of change in space, in addition to consider future, past of the place should be also considered. This study has found that human scale in an important factor in this framework and considering future. Moreover, in regard with past and emphasizing effect of place on human, historical memory of space should be considered and with emphasizing effect of human on place, collective memory factor should be considered. Accordingly, through assessment of each factor, a series of strategies should be achieved based on future and a series of expected results should be achieved based on past, so that framework of a change can be specified in limit of space dynamics index. 

References

Appelyard, D., Gerson, M. S. & Lintell, M. (1981). Livable Streets. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Bacon, Edmund (1974). Urban design: the transformation of the city from ancient Athens to modern Brasilia. Trans. Farzaneh Taheri. Tehran: Research and Studies Center of Planning and Architecture.

Behzadfar, M. & Tahmasebi, A. (2013). Identification and assessment of factors influencing social interactions to strengthen and develop relations between the citizens on the streets of the city: the case study of Sanandaj. Baghe Nazar, (25): 17-28.

Behzadfar, M. & Zabihi, M. (2011). Program guide in the development of urban areas based on public transport. Baghe Nazar, (18): 39-48.

Belzer, D. & Autler, G. (2002). Transit Oriented Development Moving from Rhetoric to Reality, A discussion paper prepared for the Brooking Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy and Great American Station Foundation, Washington, DC.

Calthrope, P. (1993). The Next American Metropolis (Ecology, Community and American Dream). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Architectural Press.

Calvino, Italo (2002). Invisible Cities. Trans. Taraneh Yalda. Tehran: Publication of the Baghe Now.

CANPZD (City of Austin Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Department) (2006). Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Guidebook. Austin: Metropolitan Council.

Community Design + Architecture (2001). Model Transit-Oriented District Overlay Zoning Ordinance. Prepared for Valley Connections, Valley.

Daneshpoor, Syed A. H. & Charkhchian, M. (2007). Public spaces and factors affecting public life. Garden view, 4 (7): 95-106.

Dittmar, H. & Poticha, Sh. (2004). Defining Transit-Oriented Development: The New Regional Building Block, The New Transit Town; Best Practices in Transit-Oriented Development, Washington, Covelo & London: Island Press.

Fadayinejad, S. & Karampoor, K. (2009). The evolution of the fabric and its impact on the removal of memory from the old fabrics (Udlajan neighborhood of Tehran). Baghe Nazar, (6): 82-100.

Fokuhi, N. (2004). Urban Anthropology, (2nd ed.). Tehran. Ney publishing.

Garrick, N. & Hanley, J. G. (2010). How Shared Space Challenges Conventional Thinking about Transportation Design. Planetizen. https://www.planetizen.com/node/47317

Golkar, S. (2000). Urban Design Quality Production Components. Profile, (34): 74-83.

Greenberg, Ellen (2004). Regulations Shape Reality: Zoning for Transit-Oriented Development, The New Transit Town; Best Practices in Transit-Oriented Development, Washington, Covelo & London: Island Press.

Habibi, Syed M. (2004). We have clear imagery of the city. Computing, architecture, building Magazine, (3).

Habibi, Syed M. (2005). The city without memory, without identity. New cities publication. The new period 2, 3, 4.

Jung, Carl Gustav (2013). Man and His Symbols, (9th ed.), Trans. Soltanieh Mahmoud. Tehran: Jami Press.

Karimi, J. (1995). Personality psychology. Tehran: Virayesh publication.

Khanmohammadi, M. A. (2009). Upgrade the theoretical foundations of sustainable architecture from the Islamic perspective, Tehran: Iran University of Science and Technology.

Khavar, Kh. (2004) Cities and collective memory. Computing, architecture, building magazine, (3).

Koolhaas, Rem (2000). Generic City, translation of Maryam Amini. Name Farhang, 10(3): 65-81.

Lang. J. T. (1987). Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Compay.

Lynch, Kevin (1995). The Theory of Town. Trans. Seyyed Hossein Bahraini. Tehran: Tehran University.

Mirmoghtadayi, M. (2009). Measures of the possibility of the formation, registration and transfer of collective memories in Tehran Case Study. Journal of Fine Arts. (37): 5-16.

Rapaport, Amos (1999). Spatial Organization and the Built Environment, (in Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology, ed. by Tim Ingold). London: Routledge, pp. 460-502.

Schultz, Norberg (2003). Architecture, Meaning and Location, Trans.Vida Norouz Borazjani. Tehran: Jane Jahan publishing.

Sultani, A. & Khodaparast, B. (2010). Evaluation of City Streets, According to Human-Oriented Approach: Case study Somayeh Street in Shiraz City. Armanshahr, Fall and Winter, (5).

Worster, Donald (2008). A Passion for Nature: The Life of John Muir. London: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-28

How to Cite

Hanif, E., Hashemnejad, H., & Ghafourian, M. (2017). Factors Affecting the Augmentation of Spatial Dynamics in Social Sustainability with an Emphasis on Human-Orientation of Space. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 6(1), 419-435. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i1.751