<b>The Use of REACT Strategy for the Incorporation of the Context of Physics into the Teaching English to the Physics English Prep Students</b>






Contextual Learning, REACT, Physics Students


The Use of REACT Strategy for the Incorporation of the Context of Physics into the Teaching English to the Physics English Prep Students


The present study explores department of Physics prep students’ (department of Physics students attending English preparatory program) relative performance in English grammar by the use of contextual learning materials in the actual classroom instruction based on the contextual learning theory. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of teaching grammar in physics context for the physics prep students to increase their interests in learning English. Another primary goal of the study is to evaluate the teaching activities which are developed in accordance with the REACT (relating, experiencing, applying, cooperating and transferring) strategy in context based approach. The study was with 25 students of Physics at an English prep-school in Turkey. With the aim of determining the effect of contextual teaching materials, sample lessons based on the contextual knowledge and the target grammar points were made. Following the lessons, a structured interview was delivered to the five of the participants. One result is that the incorporation of REACT strategy into the teaching of English to the Physics students proved to be useful for the learners who took part in the study, adding that relating, experiencing, applying, cooperating and transferring the knowledge respectively helped them use and retain the knowledge far more than the traditional classroom teaching methods in grammar teaching. Another specific outcome of the overall findings is that students were able to establish connections between what they learn and how that knowledge can be utilized in physics, which, in turn, has increased their motivation to a higher level. 

Author Biographies


Dr. Ali Sükrü ÖZBAY is an English instructor (Ph.D.) in the English Language and Literature Department of Karadeniz Technical University. He holds his BA in English Language and Literature from Ankara University and MA from KTU, Applied Linguistics Program and Ph.D. from the English Language and Literature department of KTU. His main areas of interest include Corpus Linguistics and Learner Corpora, translation studies, listening comprehension strategies, academic writing and error analysis.




Acar, B. & Yaman, M. (2011). The effects of context-based learning on students’ levels of knowledge and interest. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 40, 1-10.

Bennett, J., Lubben, F. & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: a synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education 91 (3), 347–370.

Berns, R. G., & Erickson, P. M. (2001). Contextual teaching and learning: Preparing students for the new economy. The hightlight Zone Research@ Work. Columbus, OH: National Dissemination Center for Career and Technical Education.

Best, J. and Kahn, J. (1998). Research in Education (8th edition). USA: A Viacom Company.

Blanchard, A. (2003). Contextual Teaching and Learning. Retrieved Nov 11, 2012, from www.horizonshelpr.org/contextual/ contextual.htm-8k

Byrd, P. (2005). Instructed Grammar. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, (pp. 545-563). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Byrd, Patricia. (1998). Grammar from Context. In P. Byrd & J. Reid (Eds.), Grammar in the Composition Classroom: Essays on Teaching ESL for College-bound Students, (pp. 54-68). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Cohen, L. and Manion, L. (1994). Research Methods in Education, London: Routlage.

Crawford, L. M. (2001). Teaching contextually:Research, rationale, and techniques for improving student motivation and achievement. Texas: CCI Publishing, Inc.

Dewey, J. (1956). The child and the curriculum, and the school and society. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Fensham, P. J. (2009). Real world contexts in PISA science: Implications for context-based science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (8), 884-896.

Fried-Booth, D. L. (1997). Project work. (8th Ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hadley, A.O. (2003). Teaching Language in Context. USA: Heinle & Heinle.

Hubball, H.,& Kennedy, J. (2009). Ten-year reflections on context based learning in the outdoor classroom: Enhancing teacher learning outcomes and holistic development. Transformative Dialogues. Teaching & Learning Journal, 2 (3), 3-18.

Hull, G. (1993). Hearing other voices: A critical assessment of popular views literacies and work. Harvard Education Review, 63 (1), 20--49.

Kayaoğlu, M. N. (1997). An investigation of the learning strategies of Turkish EFL and ESL adult learners and the relationship between their beliefs about different aspects of language learning and their strategy use. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Bristol, Bristol.

Khan, R. N. (2007). Effective grammar teaching in ESL classroom. BRAC University, Department of English and Humanities. Bangladesh: Ayesha Abed Library.

Mart, Ç. T. (2013). Teaching grammar in context: why and how? Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3 (1), 124-129.

Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Johnson, E. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press

Thornbury, S. (1999). How to Teach Grammar. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Sounders, J. (1999). Contextually Based Learning: Fad or Proven Practice? Retrieved Nov 11, 2012 from http://www.uga.edu/fb070999.html

Tural, G. (2013). Evaluating the react strategy activities of physics teacher candidates. Balkan Physics Letters (21), 153-159.

Wajnryb, Ruth. (1990). Grammar Dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Weaver, C. (1976). Teaching Grammar in the Context of Writing. Retrieved on Dec. 5, 2010 from:http://www.english.vt.edu/grammar/Grammarforteachers/Readings/Weaver.html

Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis, second edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Williams, M. & Burden, B. (1997). Psychology for Language Teachers: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge: CUP.

Wijarwadi, W. (2008). The effectiveness of Contextual Teaching and Learning in Teaching Speaking. A paper. Jakarta: Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teachers Training of Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University.

Zahoric, J. A. (1995). Constructivist Teaching. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.




How to Cite

ÖZBAY, A. S., & KAYAOGLU, M. N. (2015). <b>The Use of REACT Strategy for the Incorporation of the Context of Physics into the Teaching English to the Physics English Prep Students</b>. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 4(3), 91-117. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v4i3.482