<b>The Problems and Intentions of Structuralist Theory: The Mathematics of Mahur Beste</b>
Keywords:
Structuralism, Literature Theory, Literary Criticism, Linguistics, Ahmet Hamdi TanpınarAbstract
The Problems and Intentions of Structuralist Theory: The Mathematics of Mahur Beste
Abstract
Berna Moran points out that structuralism is not only a literary theory but also a method which can be applied to various disciplines like anthropology, psychology and sociology. (Moran, 2008, p.185) Actually, this theory has gained importance with the publication of notes of the lecture by Ferdinand de Saussure and their effects on radical changes in the field of linguistics. On the other hand, because the theory aims to search out deep structure of the elements of communication that we experience any time in everyday life, the application of this theory in social sciences is not surprising.
It is possible to think that using structuralist theory in literary texts means to ignore the literary side of the text. It is because, the literary text is usually written with feelings, not mathematical reasoning. On the other hand, it might be described as a problem that structuralist theory focuses on only a text, and it neglects the writer and the social, cultural or economic conditions that create a text. Nevertheless, the structuralist theory offers many data about deep/basic structure of the text.
This paper examines the troubles and utility of structuralism leaded by linguists and literature theorists such as Ferdinand de Saussure, Viktor Shklovsky and Roman Jakobson. After this examination, Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar’s novel, Mahur Beste is analyzed with the theory and the mathematical side of novel is found out. By this way, it is shown how the structuralism is used to reach the deep structure of literary text.
References
Adams, Hazard and Leroy Searle. (eds.). (1990). Critical Theory Since 1965. Florida: Florida State University Press.
Eaglaton, Terry. (1994). Literary Theory: An Introduction. Minnepolis & London Press.
Gürün, O.A. (1996). Psikoloji Sözlüğü. İstanbul: İnkilâp Pub.
Hançerlioğlu, Orhan. (1988). Ruhbilim Sözlüğü. İstanbul: Remzi Pub.
Leitch, Vincent B. (ed.). (2001). The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Moran, Berna. (2008). Edebiyat Kuramları ve Eleştiri. İstanbul: İletişim Pub.
Richter, David. (1998). The Critical Tradition: Classical Text and Contemporary Trends. Boston: Bedford Books.
Tanpınar, Ahmet Hamdi. (2005). Mahur Beste. İstanbul: Dergâh Pub.
* Research Assistant, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Faculty of Theology, Turkish-Islamic Literature, Muğla
e-mail: nesrin.satar@gmail.com
This article is edited and extended form of the namesake presentation that was manifested at IWES 2015, Karabük University 2nd. International Week on English Studies at Karabük University, Turkey, between 8-10 May, 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All papers licensed under Creative Commons 4.0 CC-BY.- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
