<b>The Language of Paradox in the Ironic Poetry of Emily Dickinson</b>

Authors

  • Mustafa Zeki Cirakli Karadeniz Technical University

Keywords:

Cleanth Brooks, Language of Paradox, Irony, Poetry of Emily Dickinson

Abstract

The Language of Paradox in the Ironic Poetry of Emily Dickinson

Abstract

Emily Dickinson’s poetry is characterized by her emphasis on ironic use of discourse that amounts to her persistent manifestation of individuality against hypocrisy and vanity. She exerts her peculiar poetic language in a way that helps deplore as well as explore the paradoxical human condition. This paper argues that Dickinson produces a language of poetry, which, in Cleanth Brooks’ terms, provides the reader with the “language of paradox.” Dickinson’s ironic poetry exemplifies Brooks’ idea that ironic poetry is self-conscious and satiric in nature and is made up of a language of paradox. The study, therefore, aims to reveal how the language of paradox in Dickinson’s poetry yields to irony which is primarily associated with her salient assertiveness, isolation and strong individuality.

Emily Dickinson’ın İronik Şiirlerinde Paradokslu Dil

Öz

Emily Dickinson’ın şiirlerini söylemin ironik kullanımı karakterize eder ve bu özellik onun şiirlerinin toplumdaki iki yüzlülük ve riyakârlığa karşı sürdürdüğü kararlı bireysel duruş ve isyanının dışavurumudur. Dickinson, kendine özgü şiirsel dili insanlık durumunun paradoksal niteliğini araştırmak için olduğu kadar eleştirmek için de etkili biçimde kullanmıştır. Dickinson’ın şiiri, Cleanth Brooks’un “paradokslu dil” olarak tanımladığı bir dil kullanır. Brooks, ironik şiirin öz-farkındalığı olan ve doğası gereği eleştirel tonu yüksek ve temelde paradokslu dilden oluşmuş olduğunu ileri sürer. Bu çalışma, Dickinson’ın ironik şiir dilinin Brooks’un bu kanısını doğruladığını ortaya koymaktadır. Dolayısıyla bu çalışma, Dickinson’un şiirlerindeki paradokslu dilin yazarın dikkat çekici sesi, kendini toplumdan soyutlaması ve toplum karşısındaki güçlü bireyselliğinin dışa vurumunu imleyen ironiyi incelemektedir.



Author Biography

Mustafa Zeki Cirakli, Karadeniz Technical University

KTU INGILIZ DILI VE EDEBIYATI

References

Anderson, Charles R. “From a Window in Amherst: Emily Dickinson Looks at the American Scene.” New England Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 2 (Jun ., 1958), pp. 147-171. JSTOR Arts & Sciences III. Web. 28 Nov. 2012.

Anderson, Charles R. “The Conscious Self in Emily Dickinson’s Poetry.” America Literature, Vol. 31, No. 3 (Nov., 1959), pp. 290-308. JSTOR Arts & Sciences III. Web. 28 Nov. 2012.

Bové, Paul A. “Cleanth Brooks and Modern Irony: A Kierkegaardian Critique.” Boundary 2, Vol. 4, No 3 (Spring, 1976), pp. 727-760.

Brooker, Jewel Spears. “In Conclusion: Literature and Culture in the Last Essays of Cleanth Brooks.” South Atlantic Review, Vol. 60, No.4 (Nov., 1995), pp. 129-136.

Brooks, Cleanth. “Irony and “Ironic” Poetry.” College English, Vol. 9, No. 5 (Feb., 1948), pp. 231-237.

Brooks, Cleanth. The Well Wrought Urn, Studies in the Structure of Poetry. London: DennisDobson, 1947.

Burbick, Joan. “The Irony of Self-Reference: Emily Dickinson’s Pronominal Language.” Essays in Literature 9. 1. (1982): 83-95. Literary Reference Center Plus. Web. 27 Feb. 2013.

Crane, R.S. “Cleanth Brooks: Or, the Bankruptcy of Critical Monism.” Modern Philology, Vol.45, No. 4 (May., 1948), pp. 226-245.

Dickinson, Emily. The Poems of Emily Dickinson. Jim Manis, Ed. Pennsylvania State

University, 2012. Electronic Resource.

Bloom, Harold. “Introduction” to Emily Dickinson. Ed. H. Bloom. New York: InfoBase

Publishing, 2008. 1-8.

Greene, Elsa. “Emily Dickinson Was a Poetess.” College English, Vol. 34, No. 1, Women, Writing and Teaching (Oct., 1972), pp. 63-70.

Hutchens, Eleanor N. “The Identification of Irony.” ELH, Vol.27, No.4 (Dec.. 1960), pp. 352-363.

Lentricchia, Frank. “The Place of Cleanth Brooks.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 29, No. 2 (Winter, 1970), pp. 235-251.

Rivkin, Julie and Michael Ryan, Eds. Literary Theory: An Anthology. 2nd ed. Ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.

Martin, Wendy. The Cambridge Introduction to Emily Dickinson. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Muecke, D. C. Irony and the Ironic. New York: Methuen& Co, 1970.

O’Hara, Daniel T. “The Designated Light”: Irony in Emily Dickinson (“Dare You See a Soul at the White Heat?”).” Boundary 2, Vol. 7, No. 3, Revisions of the Anglo-American Tradition: Part 2 (Spring, 1979), pp. 175-198.

Walker, Nancy. “Emily Dickinson and the Self: Humor as Identity.” Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, Vol.2, No. 1 (Spring, 1983), pp. 57-68.

Weaver, Russel. “Questioning Keats: An Introduction to Applied Hermeneutics.” Book Chapter (2006): 81- 112.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-23

How to Cite

Cirakli, M. Z. (2015). <b>The Language of Paradox in the Ironic Poetry of Emily Dickinson</b>. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 4(2), 24-38. Retrieved from http://kutaksam.karabuk.edu.tr/index.php/ilk/article/view/431

Issue

Section

Articles