A Feminist Stylistic Study
Female Depiction Through the Choice of Transitivity in English Fiction: A Feminist Stylistic Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v13i1.3313Keywords:
feminism., feminist stylistics, choice of transitivity., Brick LaneAbstract
The current study aims to investigate the depiction of women in English fiction through the choice of transitivity. It also intends to prove that female writings can be interpreted in terms of gender bias in literary language. To fulfill those two aims, a contemporary English novel is selected as a sample. It is Brick Lane by the English novelist Monica Ali. The study uses two methods of analysis, quantitative and qualitative. Quantitatively, Wmatrix, a software, is used to sort out the number of transitive and intransitive processes that are mostly used in the text. Then, the occurrences and frequencies of the processes are calculated to find out who scores higher ratios of being initiators or actors and who scores less ratios of being goals or receivers, males, or females. Qualitatively, the findings of the calculations are interpreted in terms of activity and passivity. Results show that female characters score fewer ratios of being initiators or doers for most of the processes than male characters, particularly in performing intentional material processes. Instead, they appear more in the position of receivers and goals for most of processes. So, females are represented as less active than male characters in this novel. The study attributes those results to social and cultural factors.
References
Al-Nakeeb, O. A. M. S. (2018). Fragmentation of the fe/male characters in Final Flight from Sanaa: A corpus-based feminist stylistic analysis. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(3), 221-230.
Ali, M., (2004). f. Random House E-books: Black Swan.
Beauvoir, D. S. (2007). The second sex. Understanding Inequality: the intersection of race/ethnicity, class, and gender, 75-82.
Bartley, L., & Hidalgo-Tenorio, E. (2015). Constructing perceptions of sexual orientation: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of transitivity in the Irish press. Estudios Irlandeses, (10), 14-34.
Buckner, P. A., & Francis, R. D. (Eds.). (2005). Rediscovering the British world. University of Calgary Press.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.
Denopra, M. M. P. (2012). A Feminist Stylistic Analysis of Selected Short Stories by Kerima Polotan-Tuvera. Unpublished master thesis. Diliman: University of the Philippines.
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2013). Language and gender. Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the function of language. Edward Arnold.
Hancock, C. (2005). Meaning–Centered Grammar: An Introductory Text. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
Kang, C., & Wu, X. (2015). The transitivity system and thematic meaning: a feminist-stylistics approach to Lawrence's Lady Chatterley's Lover. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(6), 1200-1205.
Litosseliti, L. (2006). Language and gender: Theory and practice. London: Hodder Education.
Mills, S. (1995). Feminist Stylistics. London: Routledge.
Moi, T. (2008). I am not a woman writer' About women, literature, and feminist theory today. Feminist theory, 9(3), 259-271.
Monroe, J. A. (1987). A feminist vindication of Mary Wollstonecraft. Iowa Journal of Literary Studies, 8(1), 143-152.
Rahimnouri, Z., & Ghandehariun, A. (2020). A Feminist Stylistic Analysis of Doris Lessing’s The Fifth Child (1988). Journal of Language and Literature, 20(2), 221-230.
Shah, S. K., Zahid, S., Shakir, A., & Rafique, S. (2014). Representation of women in Mann O Salwa: A case study through feminist stylistic analysis. Research on humanities and social sciences, 4(7), 90-105.
Thompson, G. (2013). Introducing functional grammar. Routledge.
Wales, K. (2001). A Dictionary of Stylistics. 2nd ed. England: Pearson Educated.
Wollstonecraft, M. (1992). A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. 1792. The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, 5, 217.
Zala, D. J. B. (2013). Literature and society. International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(5), 26-31.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of History Culture and Art Research
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers licensed under Creative Commons 4.0 CC-BY.- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.