The Philosophy of Security in the Globalizing Culture System

Authors

  • Sergey Viktorovich Kononov
  • Artem Vadimovich Zhukov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i3.2848

Keywords:

Security, National Security, Nation and State, World Community, Soft Power, Postmodern Concepts Literature.

Abstract

The article presents an attempt to analyze modern theories of security within Western philosophical concepts. The authors’ goal is to conceptualize modern philosophical notions of security. To reach it, the authors use the following methodology: phenomenological and hermeneutical analysis of texts, as well as historical, cultural, and comparative analysis. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that the modern trends of development of the philosophy of safety here are connected with the drive to conceptualize the essence of security as a sophisticated and complex system, with its structure including several subsystems, such as the human being, the society, the authorities, and the international community. The authors' reason that the synthesis of these concepts and their ideas gives ground for an integral concept of security. It could take into account the points of concepts that indicate the material, ontological content of threats from the outer, globalizing world, and the mental content of threats constructed by consciousness, responding to the increasing influence of modern informatization and virtualization processes. According to the authors, within the integral security concept, and based on the complementarity principle, it is necessary to synthesize the ideas of the national-state concept of security, the “international community” concept, the “soft power” concept, and the postmodern concepts. Such concepts, dedicated to the modern threats, regard the possibility of protection from them only within the framework of the collective security system that takes into account the defense from external and mental threats to the individual, society, and the state.

References

Alexander, J. B. (2010). Future war. Non-lethal weapons in 21st century warfare. N.Y.: Macmillan Publishers.

Barthes, R. (2012) Izbrannye raboty. Semiotika. Poetika [Selected works: Semiology. Poetics]. Moscow: Progress.

Baudrillard, J. (2010) The agony of power. Semiotext(e). Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press.

Bauman, Z. (2017) Szkice z teorii kultury [Essays in cultural theory]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe “Scholar”.

Beck, U. (2009) World at risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bell, D. (2004) The coming of post-industrial society: A venture of social forecasting. Moscow: Academia.

Burton, J. (1996) Conflict resolution: its language and processes. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press.

Bzhezinsky, Z. (1970) Between two ages. America's role in the technotronic era. N. Y.: The Viking Press.

Chalmers, D. (2015) The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Moscow: Librocom

Garrett, G. (1998) Global markets and national politics: Collision Course or Virtuous Circle? International Organization, 22 (2), 205-226.

Giddens, A., Diamond, P. (2005) The new egalitarianism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Habermas, J. (2019) This too a history of philosophy. Łódz: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.

Heidegger, M. (2002) The essence of human freedom: An introduction to philosophy. London, N.Y.: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Luhmann, N. (2000) Organisation und entscheidung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Morgenthau, H. J. (1948) Politics among nations. The struggle for power and peace. N. Y.: Alfred A. Knopf.

Nye, J. (2004) Soft power: The means to success in world politics. N Y: Public Affairs Group.

Tahir, D., Hattab, S., Mappatoba, M. (2020) Building public trust through service quality based on leadership and organizational culture. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 55(3). http://jsju.org/index.php/journal/article/view/602

Ter, K. L. Singapore's cybersecurity strategy. Computer Law and Security Review, 34(4), 924-927.

Tien, N. H., Van Tien N., Jose, R. J. S., Duc, N. M., Ngoc, N. M. (2020) Internal instability as a security challenge for Vietnam. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 55(4). http://jsju.org/index.php/journal/article/view/692

Eco, U. (2014) From the tree to the labyrinth: Historical studies on the sign and interpretation, Harvard University Press

Toynbee, A. J. (1948) Civilization on trial. London: Oxford University Press

Wolfers, A. (1962) Discord and collaboration. Essays on international politics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press

Downloads

Published

2020-09-30

How to Cite

Kononov, S. V., & Zhukov, A. V. (2020). The Philosophy of Security in the Globalizing Culture System. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 9(3), 415-422. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i3.2848