The Inauthenticity Problem of Human Being in Russian Philosophy

Alexander V. Usachyov

Özet


The study discusses the problem of inauthentic human being (existence) in modern world based on Russian religious philosophy works included in the curriculum. The study uses a comparative and analytical approach, on the basis of which the ideas of European philosophy are compared with the thoughts of Russian authors. This comparison helps to create a discussion field where the problem of human inauthenticity can be clarified and verified. According to Russian philosophers, there are certain provisions in Western philosophy, which state that the perception of a human as a separate kind of being among other beings leads to the loss of traits that are decisive in many aspects of the human existence. The study aims to justify these provisions.

The study presents all stages of comparing Russian and Western philosophy’s understanding of a human, which are related to the formation of a concept that underlies the anthropology of ideal-realism. This concept establishes in great detail that human can be considered only from the standpoint of an organic worldview and outside of an abstract approach that exaggerates one of the aspects of human being. The research results are novel and have a practical significance for a detailed analysis of human being and the inauthenticity problem. The study defines the problem, its semantic boundaries, and the set of concepts and categories, within which the problem is outlined. The study also determines that the problem can be solved at the level of statements and intuitions. The statement of the purpose is heuristic and may contain forecasts and perspective conclusions based on the analysis of human being, the relevance of which today is all too clear. The identification of the human being’s essential features will help us understand why many concepts interpret the existence one-sidedly, abstractly, without considering other important aspects.


Anahtar Kelimeler


Existence, Inauthenticity, Subject, Object, Objectification, Dementalization, Thinking, Worldview, Incomprehensible, Alienation.

Tam Metin:

PDF (English)

Referanslar


Astapov, S. N. (2019). The contradictory unity of faith and reason in Christian theoretical thought (2019) HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 75(4), Article No. a5273. DOI: 10.4102/hts.v75i4.5273

Berdyaev, N. A. (1989). The Meaning of the Creative Act. Moscow: Truth. Pp. 608.

Berdyaev, N. A. (2000). The Fate of Russia. Moscow: EKSMO-PRESS. Pp. 734.

Berdyaev, N. A. (2003). The Destiny of Man. The Experience of Paradoxical Ethics. Moscow.: FOLIO.

Berdyaev, N. A. (2007). The Self and the World of Objects. Moscow: AST Keeper.

Bodea, R. O. (2019). Nikolai Berdyaev's Dialectics of Freedom: In Search for Spiritual Freedom. Open Theology, 5(1), 299-308. DOI: 10.1515/opth-2019-0023

Dendiberya, A. A. (2015). Berdyaev’s Ideas about State and Law. Philosophy of Law, 7, 44–53.

Frank, S. L. (1990). Works. Moscow: Truth.

Gaisin, A. (2018). Solovyov’s metaphysics between gnosis and theurgy. Religions, 9(11), Article No. 354. DOI: 10.3390/rel9110354

Golovanova, N. F. and Lomakina, I.S. (2018). Anthropological inconsistencies in educational characteristics: Comparative approach. Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania, 36(6), 10-17. DOI: 10.32744/pse.2018.6.1

Grober, E. M. (2016). Berdyaev’s Principle of Communotornost as the Basis for the Formation of Interethnic Unity. Humanities Scientific Research, 1.

Grober, E. M. and Bodrov, A. A. (2015). The Reception of Berdyaev’s Ideas in Modern Socio–Economic Reality. Scientific and methodological electronic journal “Concept”, 13, 1476–1480.

Heidegger, M. (1993). Time and Being. Moscow: Republic.

Hughes, R. A. (2014). Nikolai Berdyaev’s Apophaticism. St Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly, 58(2), 441-455.

Husserl, E. (2000). Logical Investigations. Minsk–Moscow: AST.

Ilyin, I. A. (2002). Axioms of Religious Experience. Moscow: AST.

Inishev, I. (2018). Heidegger and Russian philosophizing: The productivity of the distance. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 7(2), 546-553. DOI: 10.21638/2226-5260-2018-7-2-546-553

Kiejzik, L. (2018). The beginnings of Berdyaev's critical marxism (in light of his unpublished correspondence with Kautsky). Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Filosofiia i Konfliktologiia, 34(2), 177-185. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.204

Lossky, N. O. (1991). Selected Works. Moscow: Truth.

Malinin, S. A. (2014). Ivan Ilyin, a Philosopher and Essayist. Young Scientist, 15, 417–419.

Malinov, A. V. (2018). Discourse of nature in Gregory Skovoroda's teaching. Rivista di Estetica, 67(1), 33-48. DOI: 10.4000/estetica.2559

Malinov, A. V. and Kupriyanov, V. A. (2019). Vladimir Lamansky in Saint Petersburg University. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Istoriya, 64(1), 211-221. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu02.2019.112

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1989). German Ideology. Moscow: Publishing House of Political Literature.

Oborsky, A. Y., Chistyakov, A. A., Prokopyev, A. I., Nikolyukin, S. V., Chistyakov, K. A., and Tararina, L. I. (2018). The national mentality in the history of philosophy. XLinguae, 11(3), 158-165. DOI: 10.18355/XL.2018.11.03.15

Pascal, B. (2003). Thoughts. Moscow: FOLIO.

Petkanič, M. (2018). The concept of personality in the work of Russian philosopher Nikolai Alexandrovich Berdyaev (Climax of the personalistic line of Slavic thought). Konstantinove Listy, 11(1), 130-137. DOI: 10.17846/CL.2018.11.1.130-137

Polipchuk, D. S. (2014). Specifics of Ilyin’s Religious Philosophy. Tambov University Review. Series Humanities, 15–21.

Poltoratskiy, N. P. (1975). Berdyaev. Russian Religious-Philosophical Thought of the 20th Century. Collection of articles. Pittsburgh.

Poltoratskiy, N. P. (1975). Russian Religious-Philosophical Thought of the 20th Century. Collection of articles. Pittsburgh.

Pylaev, M. (2018). Prolegomena to any future religious studies that may appear as Christian religious studies. Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo Gumanitarnogo Universiteta, Seria I. Bogoslovie, Filosofia, Religiovedenie, 80, 119-126. DOI: 10.15382/sturI201880.119-126

Rojek, P. (2019). God and Cogito: Semen Frank on the ontological argument. Studies in East European Thought, 71(2), 119-140. DOI: 10.1007/s11212-019-09326-5

Shakhnovich, M. M., Tyzhov, A. Y., and Popov, D. S. (2019). The Discussion on Stoicism in Russian Thought of the second half of the 19th –early 20th century and the History of the Study of Christianity. Bylye Gody, 53(3), 1125-1133. DOI: 10.13187/bg.2019.3.1125

Soloviyov, V. S. (1988). Works in 2 Volumes. Vol. 1. Moscow: Thought.

Soloviyov, V. S. (1988). Works in 2 Volumes. Vol. 2. Moscow: Thought.

Tenace, M. (2019). The Cultural and Ecclesial Implications of the Debate according to Vladimir Solovyov. Obnovljeni Zivot, 74(2), 153-160. DOI: 10.31337/oz.74.2.1




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i2.2693

Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.




Telif Hakkı (c) 2020 Journal of History Culture and Art Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.