Politics of Memory as a Tool of Civic Culture Formation: The Russian Specifics and Regional Aspects

Konstantin V. Vodenko, Sergey S. Chernykh, Dmitry L. Ustimenko, Alexei L. Ustimenko

Özet


The purpose of the research is to describe the specifics of the formation of the discourse of politics of memory in Russia and to determine the means of its instrumentalization as applied to the processes of development of civic culture, aimed at unification of people around the common historical heritage. Regarding methodology, the potential of cultural & sociological approach, constructivism, the theory of social and symbolic capital, and inter-disciplinary analysis of monumental policy and its role in consideration of civic culture and creation of significant images of historical past is used. The authors dwell on the key directions in the spheres of studying the politics of memory in Russia as a tool of formation of civic culture in the context of global and regional trends; determine the specifics of politics of memory in Russia and define the state’s role in this process in view of the tendencies of formation of civic nation and unification around the common historical heritage; describe the complexities which might be faced by politics of memory in South of Russia – which are largely predetermined by the ethnocultural differences; consider further perspectives of development of research of politics of memory and civic culture in Russia within the influence of the “Eastern European discourse of memory” and other regional narratives.


Anahtar Kelimeler


Politics of memory, Wars of memory, Civic culture, Culture of memory, Monumental policy, Legitimacy, State and civil society, Historical heritage.

Tam Metin:

PDF (English)

Referanslar


Achkasov, V. А. (2015). The Role of “Historical Politics” in Formation of the Russian Identity. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 18(2), 181-192.

Alexander, J. (2013). The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. Мoscow: Praksis.

Alexander, J. C., & Mast, J. L. (2006). Introduction: Symbolic Action in Theory and Practice. The Cultural Pragmatics of Symbolic Action. In J. C. Alexander, B. Giesen, & J. L. Mast (Eds.), Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual (pp. 1-28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Anderson, B. (2016). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Мoscow: Kuchkovo Pole.

Bespalova, Т. V. (2017). Politics of Memory and Oblivion in Modern Russia: The Problem of Methodology. In T. A. Senyushkina & А. V. Baranov (Eds.), Political Space and Social Time. 1917–2017: Senses and Values of the past Century: Collection of Works of the XХХII Kharak Forum (pp. 38-46).

Bourdieu, P. (2007). Sociology of Social Environment. Мoscow: Institute of Experimental Sociology.

Bourdieu, P. (2016). On the State: Lectures at the Collège De France (1989-1992). Мoscow: Delo Publication.

Forest, B., & Johnson, J. (2011). Monumental Politics: Regime Type and Public Memory in Post-communist States. Post-soviet Affairs, 27(3), 269-288.

Gill, G. (2013). Symbolism and Regime Change in Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. O. (2000). The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lowenthal, D. (2004). The past Is a Foreign Country. St Petersburg: Vladimir Dal.

Malinova, О. Y. (2012). Political Use of the past as a Tool of Symbolic Politics: The Evolution of Discourse of the Political Elite in Post-soviet Russia. Political Expertise: Politeks, 8(4), 179-204.

Malinova, О. Y. (2015). Actual Past: Symbolic Politics of the Political Elite and Dilemmas of the Russian Identity. Мoscow: Political Encyclopedia.

Methodological Issues of Studying Politics of Memory: Collection of Scientific Works. (2018). A. I. Miller & D. V. Efremenko (Eds.). Мoscow: Nestor-istoria.

Miller, A. I. (2016). Nation, or Power of Myth. St Petersburg: European University in St. Petersburg Publication.

Miller, А. I. (2013). The Role of Expert Communities in Politics of Memory in Russia. Politia: Analysis. Chronicles. Forecast (Journal of Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics), 4(71), 114-126.

Miller, А. I. (2016). Politics of Memory in Post-communist Europe and Its Influence on the European Politics of Memory. Politia: Analysis. Chronicles. Forecast (Journal of Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics), 1(80), 111-121.

Patriotic Education of the Youth of Rostov Oblast: Problems, Perspectives, and New Approaches: Collective Monograph. (2013). Y. G. Volkov (Ed.). Rostov-on-don: Mart Publication.

Semenenko, I. S. (2016). Politics of Identity and Identity in Politics: Ethno-national Aspects, European Context. Policy. Political Studies, 4, 8-24.

Serikov, А. V. (2014). The State and Problems of Development of the Don Cossackdom. Humanitarian of the South of Russia, 4, 164-171.

Tishkov, V. А. (2013). Construction of Nations. Russian Polyethnicity in the Global Context. Russia in the Global Politics, 5, 160-174.

Tishkov, V. А. (2013). Russian Nation. History and Sense of National Identity. Мoscow: Nauka.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i2.2683

Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.




Telif Hakkı (c) 2020 Journal of History Culture and Art Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.