Conceptual Basis of Legal Monitoring Implementation in The System of Public Administration

Ihor Onyshchuk, Svitlana Onyshchuk, Olga Rudenko

Özet


In the study, the question of the theory and practice of legal monitoring is developed and the expediency of introducing legal monitoring into the system of public administration of Ukraine with the purpose of its perfection is substantiated. It is shown that the basis of monitoring is a system of indicators that characterize a concrete measure of a change in a particular phenomenon or process. The practice of applying the integral indicator of government administration to Governance Research Indicator Country Snapshot is presented. Moreover, examples of monitoring are provided for such indexes as government effectiveness; regulatory quality; rule of law.

As a result of the study, a recommendation was made to assess the state of the state administration system, focused on the results of monitoring the effectiveness of legislation and its practice. The monitoring mechanisms are proposed for elimination of shortcomings in the legislation.

The improvement of the legal system is an incentive for improving the legal and informational literacy of all categories of civil servants. Such a task can be solved by introducing new criteria into the system of attestation of specialists in public administration and court employees. This is necessary to add and refine the training programs for students in management and information specialties. Legal monitoring should be part of the administrative and legal reforms in Ukraine.


Anahtar Kelimeler


Legal monitoring, State administration, Efficiency of legal acts, Monitoring indicators, Legal control

Tam Metin:

PDF (English)

Referanslar


Akmalova, A. A., & Kapicyna, D. V. (2013). Monitoring kak vid pravovogo kontrolja [Monitoring as a type of legal control]. Ars administrandi, 2, 13–26.

Arzamasov, Ju. G., & Nakonechnyj Ja. E. (2009). Monitoring v pravotvorchestve: teorija i metodologija [Monitoring in law-making: theory and methodology]. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo MGTU im. N. Je. Baumana.

Zhawnjarovich, S. A. (2000). Pryncypy zakanadawchaga pracjesu [The principles of the legislative process]. Vesnik GrDU. Seryja 1, 2, 127–136.

Lysenko, M. O. (2014). Pravovyj monitoryng jak administratyvno-pravovyj zasib zabezpechennja zakonnosti u pravotvorchij dijal'nosti organiv vykonavchoi' vlady [Legal monitoring as an administrative and legal means of ensuring legality in law-making activity of executive authorities]. Chasopys Kyi'vs'kogo universytetu prava, 3, 101–104.

OPORA. (2016). Monitoryngovyj proekt: analiz dijal'nosti 105 deputativ-mazhorytarnykiv [Monitoring project: analysis of the activities of 105 Majoritarian deputies]. Retrieved from https://rada.oporaua.org/dorogi-deputati/novini/8802-monitorynhovyi-proekt-opory-robota-deputativ-mazhorytarnykiv-u-okruhakh-2016

Onyshchuk, I. I. (2017). Pravovyj monitoryng: problemy metodologii', teorii' ta praktyky: monografija [Legal monitoring: problems and methodologies, theories and practices: monographs]. Ivano-Frankivs'k – Drogobych: Kolo.

Pashtov, D. R. (2014). Provedenie prokuraturoj pravovogo monitoringa normativnyh pravovyh aktov (sostojanie i perspektivy) [Conducting prosecutor's office legal monitoring of regulatory legal acts (state and prospects)]. Pravovaja iniciativa, 1. Retrieved from http://49e.ru/ru/2014/1/6

The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. (2004). Pokazateli jeffektivnosti reformy gosudarstvennogo upravlenija [Indicators of the effectiveness of public administration reform]. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo «Aleks».

Chernogora, N. N. (2010). Pravovoj monitoring: aktual'nye problemy teorii i praktiki [Legal monitoring: actual problems of theory and practice]. Moskva: Mezhdunarodnyj juridicheskij institut.

Marochkin, I. Je., Karkach, P. M., Groshevoj Ju. M., & Marochkin, I. Je. (Eds.), Karkach, P. M. (2006). Prokurors'kyj nagljad v Ukrai'ni [Prosecutorial oversight in Ukraine]: pidruch. dlja stud. juryd. spec. vyshhyh navch. zakl. Harkiv: TOV «Odissej».

Constitutional Court of Ukraine. (2004). Rishennja Konstytucijnogo Sudu Ukrai'ny u spravi za konstytucijnym podannjam Verhovnogo Sudu Ukrai'ny shhodo vidpovidnosti Konstytucii' Ukrai'ny (konstytucijnosti) polozhen' statti 69 Kryminal'nogo kodeksu Ukrai'ny (sprava pro pryznachennja sudom bil'sh m’jakogo pokarannja) № 15-rp/2004 vid 2 lystopada 2004 roku. Sprava №1-33/2004. [The decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case of the constitutional petition of the Supreme Court of Ukraine on the compliance of the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) with the provisions of Article 69 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (case on the imposition of a more lenient punishment) No. 15-rp / 2004 of 2 November 2004]. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v015p710-04

Tomkina, O. O. (2005). Akty Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrai'ny: teoretychni zasady vydannja ta realizacii' [Acts of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine: Theoretical Principles of Publication and Implementation]: avtoref. dys. ... kand. juryd. nauk: 12.00.07. Kyi'vs'kyj nac. ekon. un-t. Kyi'v.

Baranov, V. M., & Tolstik V. A. (2012). Juridicheskaja tehnika: kurs lekc. [Legal technology: course of lecture]. Moskva: DGSK MVD Rossii.

Cooter, R. D. (1997). The Rule of State Law and the Rule-of-Law State: Economic Analysis of the Legal Founations of Development. The Selected Works of Robert Cooter, 91–217.

The Advocates for Human Rights. (2011). Documenting the implementation of domestic violence laws: a human rights monitoring methodology, 60, 9. Minneapolis.

Herzberg, R. D. (2005). Die ratio legis als Schlüsel zum Geset-zesverständnis? JuS, 1–4.

Council of Europe. (2010). Practical impact of the Council of Europe monitoring mechanismsin improving respect for human rights and the rule of law in member states. Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Council of Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2010.

Venice Commission. (2016). Rule of Law Checklist. (Adopted by the at its 106th Plenary Session). Strasbourg.

Snyder, F. (1993). The effectiveness of European Community law: institutions, processes, tools and techniques. Modern law review. Vol. 56. London, 19–56.

Stanley, R., Bullock, H., & Mountford, J. (2001). Better Policy-Making. London: Centre for Management and Policy Studies.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i1.2547

Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.




Telif Hakkı (c) 2020 Journal of History Culture and Art Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.