Philosophical Foundations of Education

Andrey I. Vinogradov, Oxana Viktorovna Savateeva, Svetlana A. Vinogradova

Özet


The article is focused on the problem of defining the philosophy of education and its subject matter. It analyses different points of view on the definition of this term and tries to combine mutually exclusive approaches. To solve this issue, the authors use the vast experience in addressing it in the late 19th and early 20th centuries in Russian and German philosophical and pedagogical thought. The authors believe that the similarity between that era and our times makes it possible to use the ideas of thinkers of the past for resolving the issues of today. Besides, the authors of the article try to define the subject matter of philosophy of education by examining the issues that can cumulatively constitute a subject of philosophy of education. They compare the terms “pedagogy” and “education” and show that shifting from one term to the other results in a loss of some meanings in an educational paradigm. They describe a specific importance of guidance in pedagogical activities. Another aspect of the subject of philosophy is the ethical nature of education. The article stresses the importance of moral development of a personality. The authors believe that it is very important to pay attention to the warning expressed by many thinkers of the late 19th and early 20th centuries on the danger of “technocratism”, i.e. prioritising technical education over humanities. Nowadays, this warning made a century ago has become even more relevant. The article further analyses the idea of correlation between guidance and politics and examines ideas of renowned thinkers on the problem of developing a free personality. Finally, the article touches upon the problem of nation-specific education. In the authors’ opinion, these issues cumulatively constitute the subject of philosophy of education.


Anahtar Kelimeler


Philosophy of education, Education, Guidance, Moral, Technocratism, Freedom.

Tam Metin:

PDF (English)

Referanslar


Aleksandrova, R. I. (1989). The Use of Art, Critical and Journalistic Literature in the Course of Philosophy. Saransk: Saransk University.

Aykhenvald, Y. I. (1900). Essay on the Pedagogical Views of I. G. Fichte. Bulletin of Education, 8, 4-15.

Chandra, S. S. (2006). Philosophy of Education. Atlantic Publishers & Dist. Ltd.

Clark, J. (2006). Philosophy of Education in Today’s World and Tomorrow’s: A View from ‘Down Under’ Paideusis, vol. 15, 1, 21-30.

Ern, F. (1896). Pedagogical Ideas of Kemsis. Bulletin of Education, 6, 36-38.

Ilyin, I. F. (1997). Instinct of Spirituality. School of Spirituality, 1, 24–33.

Ilyin, I. F. (1994). What should we do? Russian idea: In the circle of writers and thinkers of the Russian Diaspora. 2 vols. Moscow: Iskusstvo. vol. 1, 426-427.

Kareev, N. I. (1901). The Ideals of General Education. Bulletin of Education, 9, 3-7.

Kemsies, F. (1886). Der Vergleich der Unterrichtsgrundsätze von J. F. Herbart und A. Diesterweg. Königsberg: Gumbinnen: W. Krauseneck.

Le Bon, G. (1995). The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. Sankt Petersburg: “Maket” Publ.

Lozinsky, E. (1905). Problems of Morality in Modern Education. Bulletin of Education, 9, 23-34.

Obukhov, А. (1909). Free Education and Discipline Bulletin of Education, 7, 23-33.

Pöggeler, O. (1980). Die Pädagogik und das Verhältnis der Generationen: Sinn und Geschichtlichkeit. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

Roberson, T. (2000). Philosophy of philosophy: making the connection between philosophy and pedagogy for preservice teachers. Paper presented at Meeting for the Society for Philosophy and History of Education, Biloxi, MS. September, 29.

Siegel, H. (2009). Introduction: Philosophy of Education and Philosophy. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Sedov, L. (1911). The Main Problems of the General Theory of Education. Bulletin of Education, 9, 24-30.

Rozanov, V. V. (1990). Twilight of Enlightenment. Moscow: Russian Language Culture.

Rubinstein, М. М. (1920). About Religious Upbringing. Essay on Educational Psychology in Connection with Common Pedagogy. Vestnik vospitanija, 1. 1913, 75-123.

Rubinstein, М. М. (1913). Moral Character and Ways to Train It. Bulletin of Education, 2, 18-26.

Rubinstein, М. М. (1917). Modern Education and Morality. Bulletin of Education, 1, 17-33.

Solovyov, V. S. (1996). The Justification of the Good. Moscow: Institut russkoj tsivilizatsii.

Strelchenko, V. I. (1995). The Subject of Pedagogy as a Problem of the Philosophy of Pedagogy. Philosophy of Education and Traditions of the Russian School. Sankt Petersburg, 7–8.

Tolstoy, L. N. (1991). Conversations with Children on Moral Issues. Gospel for Children. Tula: Posrednik.

Wentzel, K. N. (1896). Ethics, Pedagogy and Politics. Bulletin of Education, 2, 12-32.

Wentzel, K. N. (1896). The Main Tasks of Moral Upbringing. Bulletin of Education, 2, 1-47.

Vakhterov, V. P. (1987). Selected Pedagogical Works. Moscow: Pedagogika.

Vinogradov, V. N. (1995). The Problem of the Subject of Pedagogy as the Main Issue of the Philosophy of Education. Philosophy of Education and Traditions of the Russian School. Sankt Petersburg: Russian Christian Institute of Humanities, 9–12.

Ushinsky, K. D. (1948). About the Moral Element in Education. Collected works. 11 vols. Vol.2. Moscow: Academy of Pedagogical Sciences Publ. pp.425-488.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i3.2389

Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.




Telif Hakkı (c) 2020 Journal of History Culture and Art Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.