From Myth to History: The Emergence of Historiographical Tradition in China

Authors

  • Rustem Ravilevich Muhametzyanov Kazan Federal University
  • Ilina Radikovna Usmanova Kazan Federal University
  • Nadezhda Alexandrovna Somkina Saint-Petersburg State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i3.2254

Keywords:

China, Chinese history, Confucius, Ancient Chinese myths, Euhemerization, Zhou Dynasty, Shang-Yin Dynasty, Historicization.

Abstract

The Chinese civilization, despite having experienced many historical shocks, shows consistency in its sociocultural institutions and adherence to traditional values which were formed in ancient times. Many experts claim the Chinese people’s deep knowledge and respect for their history is one of the reasons for China’s cultural consistency. The worship of antiquity is one of the important characteristics traced in many spheres of Chinese history. In this paper, we will elaborate on the issue of the basis for the emergence of this worship. The studied phenomenon arose during the Zhou period and was strengthened by Confucius and his disciples. Since then, antiquity worship hasn’t been revised by society. The formation of antiquity worship in traditional China went gradually, and a total reshaping of Ancient China’s spiritual life was needed for that. In this research, we will try to find out how this worship came to be. Such analysis is not only interesting for the studies of Chinese civilization but also for the research of the specifics of the Middle Kingdom’s spiritual culture. The analysis of cultural specifics of China must help uncover the mechanisms of this civilization’s consistency.

References

Bazhanova, R. K.; Martynov, D. E. & Martynova, Yu. A. (2014). Typological features of Chinese culture in the Ming Dynasty (1398-1644). Terra Sebus. Acta Musei Sabesiensis, Special Issue, pp. 475-489.

Bichurin, I. (1842). Statistical Description of the Chinese Empire. Part 1. – Saint-Petersburg: Typography of E. Pratz, – 278 p.

Birrell, A. (1999). Chinese Mythology: An Introduction. JHU Press.

Hung, H. M. (2011). The Road to the Throne: How Liu Bang Founded China's Han Dynasty. Algora Publishing.

Jaspers, K. (1994). The Origin and Goal of History. M.: Respublika, - 527 p.

Jiachen, Z. (2017). The Cultural Content and Historical Impact of the Image of Emperor Shun. Contemporary Chinese Thought, 48(4), pp. 225-231

Kravtsova, M. Ye. (1991). From Magic to Ethics. Ideas of the Supreme Power and Its Bearers in Ancient and Early Middle Age China. Vostok: Afrikansko-aziatskie obschestva: istoriya i sovremennost’, 3, pp. 32 – 41.

Literature of the Ancient East. (1984). Iran, India, China (texts). Authors-compilers: Yu. A. Alikhanov, V. B. Nikitina, L. Ye. Pomerants. – M.: Izdatel’stvo MGU, – 352 p.

Malyavin, V. V. (2000). Chinese Civilization. – M.: Izdatel’stvo Astrel’, – 632 p.

Meletinsky, Ye. M. (2012). The Poetics of Myth. – M.: Akademichesky proyekt, - 331 p.

Mythology of the Ancient World. (1977). Translated from English and prefaced by I. M. Dyakonov. – M.: Nauka, – 455 p.

Vasilyev, L. S. (1989). Problems of the Genesis of Chinese Thought (the Formation of the Basics of Worldview and Intellect). M.: Nauka, – 367 p.

Yanshina, E. M. (1977). Gods and “Officials” (based on the materials of Ancient Chinese documents) // Kitay: istoriya, kul’tura i istoriografiya. – M.: Nauka, – pp. 124-130.

Yanshina, Ye. M. (1984). Formation and Development of Ancient Chinese Mythology. – M.: Nauka, – 248 p.

Yuan, Ke. (1987). Mythology of Ancient China. – M.: Nauka, – 527 p.

Yerizon, Putra, A. A., & Subhan, M. (2018). Mathematics Learning Instructional Development based on Discovery Learning for Students with Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Intelligence (Preliminary Research Stage). International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 97-101. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/2701

Downloads

Published

2019-10-01

How to Cite

Muhametzyanov, R. R., Usmanova, I. R., & Somkina, N. A. (2019). From Myth to History: The Emergence of Historiographical Tradition in China. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 8(3), 389-396. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i3.2254