The Views of School Administrators toward Issues of School Siting: A Geographical Analysis

Mustafa Sağdıç, Hilmi Demirkaya

Özet


The purpose of this study is to examine the views of school administrators with respect to school siting, conducted by themselves, by means of geographical perspectives in İstanbul province. This qualitative research was designed as a phenomenological study. Data were collected via individual semi-structured interview form that was developed by the researchers based on the literature review, expert opinions, and pilot study. Content analysis method was applied while assessing the interview records. Depending on the findings obtained through an open-ended questionnaire, the following categories are formed; a) Positive Themes: (1) Safe environment, (2) Easy transportation and large school playground and (3) Socially-favorable environment, b) Negative Themes: (1) High risk of natural disaster, (2) Intensive urbanization and insufficient schoolyard, (3) Wrong location selection, (4) Unsuitable social environment and (5) Transportation problems. Therefore, findings from this research are expected to encourage the Turkish government, especially the Ministry of National Education, to develop and create a guideline for the safe school environment in Turkey.


Anahtar Kelimeler


Geographical analysis, School administrators, School location, School environment.

Tam Metin:

PDF (English)

Referanslar


Ahlport, K.N., Linnan, L., Vaughn, A., Evenson, K.R. & Ward, D.S. (2008). Barriers to and facilitators of walking and bicycling to school: Formative results from the non-motorized travel study. Health Education Behavior, 35, 221-244.

Buerger, C. (2005). Unintended Effects of Charteer School Programs. Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs of Syracuse University (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), Syracuse, New York.

Bukhari, Z., Rodzi, A. M. & Noordin, A. (2010). Spatial multi-criteria decision analysis for safe school site selection. International Geoinformatics Research and Development Journal 1(2), 1-14.

CDE (California Department of Education),(1998). California Department of Education Site Selection Criteria, 1998. http://www.cde.ca.gov/ls/fa/sf/schoolsiteguide.asp [Accessed March 3, 2018]).

Campbell, R., Corbally, J. & Nystrand, R. (1983). Introduction to Educational Administration. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Clinchy, E. (Ed.). (2000). Creating new schools: How small schools are changing American education. Columbia University, New York: Teachers College Press.

Calik, T. (2003). Management of change in education: A conceptual analysis. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 36, 536-557.

Cobanoglu, G. & Cobanoglu, Z. (2001). Training manual of environmental health. T.R. Ministry of health, Ankara: Directorate General for Health Investments and General Directorate of Basic Health Services Publications.

D'Haese, S., De Meester, F., DE Bourdeaudhuıj, I., Deforche, B. & Cardon, G. (2011). Criterion distances and environmental correlates of active commuting to school in children. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8 (88),1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-88.

Duncombe, W. & Yinger, J. (2008). Measurement of cost differentials, . In edited by Helen F. Ladd & Edward B. Fiske, Handbook of research in education finance and policy, (238-256), Newyork: Routledge.

Edwards, B.W. (2006). Environmental design and educational performance. Research in Education, 76, 14-32.

Elias, W. & Katoshevski-Cavari, R. (2011). School Commuting and the Impact of Cultural Differences: The Israeli Case, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 20, 866-874.

Ewing, R., Schroeer, W. & Greene W. (2004). School Location and Student Travel Analysis of Factors Affecting Mode Choice, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1895, 55–63, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

Garnham, J. (2015). The Location of Public Schools: Implications for Communities and Planners, and School District Decision-Making in the Puget sound Region (Unpublished Master Thesis), University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Gordon, D. E. (2010). Green Schools as High Performance Learning Facilities. Washington, D.C.: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities. Retrieved on March 4, 2018, from http://www.ncef.org/pubs/greenschools.pdf

Janssen, N. A. H., Vliet, P. H. N., Aarts, F., Harssema, H. & Brunekreef, B. (2001). Assessment of exposure to traffic related air pollution of children attending schools near motorways. Atmospheric Environment, 35(22), 3875-3884.

Karakoc Ozturk, B. (2008). Evaluation of the field of reading Turkish language teaching curriculum for 6th grade of elementary school according to teacher' views. Cukurova University, Institute of Social Sciences (unpublished master thesis), Adana.

Kingham, S., Sabel, C. E. & Bartie, P. (2011). The impact of the school run on road traffic accidents: A spatio-temporal analysis. Journal of Transport Geography 19(4), 705-711.

Managing Maryland’s Growth (2008). State of Maryland, Maryland Department of Planning, Models & Guidelines 27, Smart Growth, Community Planning and Public School Construction Publication No. 2008-001 http://planning.maryland.gov/pdf/ourproducts/publications/modelsguidelines/mg27.pdf [March 3, 2017]).

McDonald, N. C. (2007). Active transportation to school trends among U.S. school children, 1969-2001. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 32(6), 509-516.

McMillan, T. (2005). Urban form and a child’s trip to school: The current literature and a frameworkfor future research. Journal of Planning Literature 19(4), 440-456.

Nazik, B. (2003). First aid practices and ways of protection in common childhood accidents, Standard Economic and Technical Journal 42(501), 52-53.

Sirard, J. R. & Slater, M. E. (2008). Walking and bicycling to school: A review. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine 2(5), 372-396.

Stewart, N. (2016). Using Pedestrian Accessibility Indicators to Locate Schools: A Site Suitability Analysis in Greenville County, South Carolina. Faculty of the USC Graduate School University of Southern California (Unpublished MA Thesis), California, U.S.A.

Olson, S.L. & Kellum, S. (2003). The Impact of Sustainable Buildings on Educational Achievements in K-12 Schools. Madison, WI: Leonardo Academy.

Onsoy, R. (1991). Primary and secondary education from the republic to present and some issues. Hacettepe University Journal of Education Faculty 6, 1-23.

Ozdemir, S. & Akkaya, E. (2013). The analysis of secondary school students’ and teachers’ mental images of school and ideal school by using metaphor. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice 19(2), 295-322.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

Polat, H. (1998). Assessment of the schools of central Ankara with regards to environmental health. Hacettepe University, Institute of Medical Sciences (unpublished master thesis), Ankara.

Raywid, M.A. & Schmerler, G. (2003). Not so easy going: The policy environments of small urban schools and schools-within-schools. Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education & Small Schools.

Sisman, E.E. & Gulturk P. (2011). Ilkögretim Okul Bahcelerinin Peyzaj Planlama ve Tasarim Ilkeleri Acisindan Incelenmesi: Tekirdag Ornegi. Tekirdag Ziraat Fakultesi Dergisi 8(3), 53-60.

TGM (The Oregon Transportation and Growth Management Program), (2005). Planning for Schools & Liveable Communities, The Oregon School Siting Handbook, Eugene, Oregon.

Tombaklar, Ö. H. (2017). Çocuklar ve trafik kazaları. http://www.trafik.gov.tr/SiteAssets/Yayinlar/Bildiriler/pdf/A6-42.pdf [Accessed June 6, 2018]).

Turkey Statistics Corporation (TUİK), (2018). Education Statistics, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1018 [Accessed October 6, 2018].

U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), Travel and Environmental Implications of School Siting, Report no. EPA 231-R-03-004 (Washington: 2003) (www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/pdf/school_travel.pdf [Accessed March 3, 2018].

Van Vliet, W. (1983). Children’s travel behavior. Ekistics 298, 61-65.

Yildirim, A. & Simsek, A. (2013). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences (9. edition). Ankara: Seckin Publications.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i3.2184

Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.




Telif Hakkı (c) 2019 Journal of History Culture and Art Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.