Intercultural Dialogue as Rhetorical Means of Forming of Multilingual Personality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i3.2157Keywords:
Intercultural dialogue, Rhetorical dialogue, Multilingual personality, Intercultural communication, Cultural identification, Cultural adaptation, Tolerance, Multilingual education.Abstract
The state and conditions of functioning of the Ukrainian language and languages of national minorities in Ukraine have led us to think about finding ways to balance the complex sociolinguistic situation in the country. In this regard, it is no coincidence the direction of modern linguadidactics on communicative and functional learning of designated languages in establishments of secondary education with multiethnic contingent of students. The social role of dialogue, connected with change of socio-cultural connections and cultural codes is becoming more and more important. The forming of global human civilization, numerous transnational and interregional conflicts, need for mutual understanding, cooperation and partnership have determined the relevance of the dialogical form of communication, which has led to a deepening of dialogue not only human thinking but also its civilized existence. The dialogical thinking is necessary for overcoming ideological stereotypes, the monopoly of thought and one-sidedness of globalism, for the forming of a person who would be able to build his relationship on the basis of humanization, finding a reasonable compromise, mutual respect, and tolerance. In the context of conceptual positions of modern rhetoric, the phenomenon of rhetorical dialogue as a unit of rhetorical communication is singled out. It is worth considering the rhetorical dialogue in the prospection of a relativistic aspect of modern rhetoric, taking into account the pragmatic sense of the influence of communicators on each other in the process of harmonizing dialogue, effective and optimal communication. That's why the intercultural dialogue in the process of forming of multilingual personality is defined as rhetorical. In the giving article, the subject of the discussion is highlighting the relevance of the intercultural dialogue as rhetorical on language lessons at schools with polyethnic contingent of pupils, clarification of the main aspects of dialogic interaction of contacting cultures, analysis of groups of national and specific vocabulary for learning by pupils-polylinguals.
References
Akhmanova, O. S. (1966). Dictionary of linguistic terms. Moscow.
Andreychina, K. (1977). The issue of national culture accounting of pupils during compiling a linguistic country study dictionary. Moscow.
Ball, G. (1997). On the verge of culture’s logic. Moscow.
Bibler, V. S. (1989). Culture. Dialogue of cultures (Experience of defining). Issues of philosophy, 6, 38.
Charnyak Yu. (1983). New in foreign linguistics. Conclusion and knowledge. Moscow.
Gritsanov, A. A. (2001). World encyclopedia: philosophy. Minsk.
Hreb, M. N. (2016). Nutzung des didaktischen Potenzials traditioneller und computerorientierter Unterrichts methoden in Lexik und Phraseologie an der pädagogischen Hochschule. Dialog der Sprachen - Dialog der Kulturen. Die Ukraine aus globaler Sicht (international internet conference).
Hreb, M. N. (2016). The methodical aspect of work under the enlargement of students' vocabulary in pedagogical higher educational establishments. Education and society. International collection of scientific works of the Berdyansk state pedagogical university. (internet edition). 137-143.
Humboldt, V. (2000). Selected works in linguistics. Moscow.
Kochergan, M. P. (1999). General linguistics. Kyiv.
Kondakov, A. M. (2004). Models of educational choice and main competences as educational resources for the development of personality, society and state. World of psychology, 2, 230-235.
Lutay, V. S. (1996). Philosophy of modern education. Kyiv.
Manakin, V. N. (1994). Basics of contrastive lexicology: closely related and related languages. Kirovograd.
Nikolaeva, S. Yu. (2003). General European recommendations in language education: study, teaching, evaluation. Kyiv.
Nischeta, V. (2014). Methods of rhetoric teaching at school. Kyiv.
Nischeta, V. (2017). Methods of forming of rhetorical competence of general school pupils. Kyiv: Monograph.
Panova, N. (2007). The role of language and speech in normative and non-normative communication. Collection of scientific works of the Institute of psychology named after G. Kostiuk of APS of Ukraine, 7(10), 289-297.
Panova, N. (2008). The psychological functions of non-normative speech constructs in communicative behavior of students youth. Donetsk: Monograph.
Panova, N. (2009). The reflection as a mechanism of forming of critical thinking (theoretical aspect). Collection of scientific works of Berdyansk state pedagogical university (pedagogical sciences), 2, 94-205.
Sternin, I. A. (2000). Models of the description of communicative behavior. Voronezh.
Yakovleva E. S. (1996). To the description of Russian linguistic picture of the world. Russian language abroad, 1-3, 47-49.
Zagorodnova, V. F. (2006). Learning of lexicology in conditions of dialogue of cultures. Nizhin.
Zagorodnova, V. F. (2008). Crosscultural study of lexics by bilingual pupils in conditions of intercultural communication. Actual problems of culturology and pedagogy (international conference) (pp. 205-210). Saint Petersburg.
Zagorodnova, V. F. (2008). Forming of critical thinking of bilingual pupils in the process of cross-cultural teaching of the Ukrainian language. Collection of scientific works of Berdyansk state pedagogical university (pedagogical sciences), 4, 71-81.
Zagorodnova, V. F. (2009). The principle of cross-cultural dialogism as one of the basis of humanization of the language educational content. Collection of scientific works of National M. Dragomanov pedagogical university (philological sciences), 8, 242-248.
Zagorodnova, V. F. (2010). Ukrainian language in the dialogue of cultures. Kyiv.
Zagorodnova, V. F. (2013). Ukrainian language teaching in the context of the cultures’ dialogue. Collection of scientific works of Berdyansk state pedagogical university (pedagogical sciences), 1, 115-124.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All papers licensed under Creative Commons 4.0 CC-BY.- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
