Archaizations in a Space of Sociocultural Transformation: A Theoretical Aspect
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i2.2151Keywords:
Archaization, Cultural layers, Sociocultural transformation, Sociocultural background, Degradation, Myth-making, Philosophical reflexion, Archetypes.Abstract
The article presents the analysis of social problems caused by the processes of archaization of contemporary Russian society. The relevance of the introduction of the concept of archaization into academic circulation as the socio-philosophical concept is that its terminological usage in the topical area of social philosophy may bring about solving a number of conceptual problems. Archaization is regarded in a space of sociocultural transformation which has been actively developing in Russian society in recent years. The authors suggest using a methodological construct for the assessment of the concept of archaization in the semantic center of which the process of the sociocultural interaction of Russian social actors is analyzed. Methodological construct is a tool of socio-philosophical analysis. Its purpose consists in identifying the essence, levels, and modes of manifestation and development of archaization in contemporary Russian society. The authors substantiate that archaization acts as a process of the sociocultural interaction the authors’ methodological construct makes it possible to identify the levels of production (representation) of archaization.
References
Akhiezer, A. S. (2001). Archaization in Russian society as a methodological problem. Obshchestvennye Nauki i Sovremennost, 2, 94-96. (In Russian).
Bedrik, A. V.; Chernobrovkin, I. P.; Lubskiy, A. V.; Volkov, Y. G. & Vyalykh, N. A. (2016). Value Policy: Conceptual Interpretation of Research Practices. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(5), 1-6.
Chernous, V. V.; Degtyarev, A. K.; Lubsky, A. V.; Posukhova, O. Y. & Volkov, Y. G. (2015). The lifestyle in the development of ideological policy. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 34-52.
Emirbekova, Y. E.; Narykov, N. V.; Samygin, S. I.; Samygin, P. S. & Rachipa, A. V. (2016). Power as a Social Phenomenon: The Nature and Importance in the Construction of the All-Russian Identity. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(5), 1-5.
Frolova, A. S.; Lubsky, A. V.; Posukhova, O. Y.; Serikov, A. V. & Volkov, Y. G. (2015). Ideological grounds for Settlement of Inter-Ethnic Relations in Modern Russia: Competition of Ideas and Ideology of Humanism. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4), 58-63.
Khrapov, S. A. (2008). Sociocultural grounds for the destructive dynamics of values of the public consciousness of post-Soviet Russia. In V.V. Kozlovskiy (ed.), Sociological diagnosis of the culture of the Russian society of the second half of the XIX – early XXI centuries, (pp.391-395). St. Petersburg: Intersotsis Publishing House. (In Russian).
Kovalev, V. V.; Kasyanov, V. V.; Bortsov, Y. S.; Goloborod’ko, A. Y. & Skudnova, T. D. (2017). The Increase in Geopolitical Competition as a Challenge (threat) to Russia's National Security. European Research Studies Journal, 20(4B), 499-508.
Kovalev, V. V.; Nagoy, A. A.; Goloborod’ko, A. Y.; Serikov, A. V. & Zhade, Z. A. (2016). The problem of loss of the dialogue form of interaction between state and society as a threat to social stability. Man in India, 96(7), 2087-2098.
Kovalev, V. V.; Volkov, Yu. G.; Lubsky, A. V.; Bineeva, N. K. & Gubnelova N. Z. (2018). Practices of solidarity as a subject of intellectual traditions in Russia and the West. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2), 71-74.
Lamazhaa, C. K. (2010). Archaization, traditionalism and neotraditionalism. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, 2, 88-93. (In Russian).
Lubsky, A. V.; Kolesnikova, E. Y. & Lubsky, R. A. (2016). Mental Programs and Social Behavior Patterns in Russian Society. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(16), 9549–9559.
Max Weber. Selection: Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. (2014). Moscow: Tsentr Gumanitarnykh Initsiativ Publishing House; Universitetskaya Kniga Publishing House. (In Russian).
Toshchenko, Z. T. (2011). Centaurus Problem (Experience of philosophical and sociological analysis). Moscow: Novyi Khronograf Publishing House. (In Russian).
Vodenko, K. V.; Rodionova, V. I.; Shvachkina, L. A. & Shubina, M. M. (2018). Russian national model for the regulation of social and economic activities: research methodology and social reality. Quality-Access to Success, 19(S2), 141-145.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All papers licensed under Creative Commons 4.0 CC-BY.- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
