Artwork Interpretations in Old and Contemporary Epic Iranian Miniatures

Sediqeh Pourmokhtar, Morteza Afshari

Özet


Artwork interpretation in a simple word is an explanation of the meaning of art. The audiences play an important role in art and forms one of the three vertices of artwork triangle: artist, artwork and audience. If we consider artwork as a process, the audiences are the outcome of the work and is the one that created for and to be seen by them. Therefore, feedbacks or interpretations and readings of them have an important place in art critique. Iran's miniatures in different eras have experienced a variety of audiences from kings to ordinary people that affect this art. Therefore, it is expected that different kinds of interpretations have been observed. The research carried out through descriptive-analytical method, by comparing old and contemporary Iranian epic miniatures seeking to answer the question of what are the kinds of artwork interpretation in old and contemporary Iranian epic miniatures? The findings of this research shows that old paintings have created interpretations based on the author's intention and contemporary painting with a hermeneutical approach made multiple interpretations of the artworks.


Anahtar Kelimeler


Audience, Old and contemporary Iranian miniatures, Interpretation, Epic.

Tam Metin:

PDF (English)

Referanslar


Abrams, M. H. & Geoffrey, Galt Harpham (2012). A Glossary of Literary Terms. Boston: Wadsworth.

Abrow, Hafez (2001). Zobdat al-Tawarikh Baysonqiri. Introduction, Corrections and Excerpts by Seyyed Kamal Haj Seyyed Javadi. Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, Printing and Publishing.

Aqamiri, Mohamad Baqer (2011). Mirror of Heart. Tehran: Guya.

Barthes, Roland (1977). The Death of the Author. In Image, Music, Text (142-148 pp.). Trans. Stephen Heath. New York: Hill and Wang.

Ferdowsi, Abolqasem (1991). The Face of Shir o Owjan Championship in Shahnameh. ed. Ali Akbar Rashidi. Tehran: Soroush.

Ferdowsi, Abolqasem (1971). Ferdowsi's Shahnameh (Baisonqori Edition). Tehran: Offset.

Ferdowsi, Abolqasem (2010). Zal and Simorgh. Tehran: Islamic Studies Institute of Tehran University.

Krausz, Michael (2001). Is there a Single Right Interpretation?. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Lin, Szu-Yen (2019). Art and Interpretation. Retrieved from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy website: https://www.iep.utm.edu/artinter/. Accessed: 30/04/2019.

McQuail, Denis (2010). McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory (6th ed.). London: Sage.

Naseripour, Mohammad (2005). Well done to your Pen O! Behzad. Tehran: Soroush.

Nozari, HoseinAli (2009). Formation of Modernity and Postmodernity. Tehran: Naghshe Jahan.

Pakbaz, Roueen (2008). Encyclopedia of Art. Tehran: Contemporary Culture.

Tavousi, Abolfazl (2011). Miniature Workshop. Tehran: Iran Textbooks Publishing Company.

Varga Kibedi, Aron (2003). Mediality and Forms of Interpretations of Artworks. Neohelicon, 30. 183-191.

Welch, Stuart Cary (1976). A King’s Book of Kings: the Shah- Nameh of Shah Tahmasp. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Yazdi, Sharaf al-Din Ali (1972). Zafarameh Tashkent: Fan Publishing.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i2.2086

Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.




Telif Hakkı (c) 2019 Journal of History Culture and Art Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.