Evaluation of Entrepreneurial Risk Level as Social Process in the Russian Economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i1.2059Keywords:
Small enterprises, Medium enterprises, Microenterprises, Acceptable risk, Critical risk, Catastrophic risk, Type of economic activity.Abstract
Development of the entrepreneurial sector requires information on the current risk levels in economy. The paper deals with three levels of entrepreneurial risk: acceptable, critical and catastrophic. The research aim is to assess the values of entrepreneurial risk that has been existing in recent years in aggregates of small and medium enterprises, formed by size and industry characteristics. Risk evaluation was made on the base of official statistics, characterize activity of all medium enterprises, small enterprises and microenterprises situated in Russia in 2015 and 2016. The paper presents the results of risk assessment for a set of medium enterprises, small enterprises and microenterprises in the Russian economy. From the results of the study it has been concluded that there is a significant differentiation of entrepreneurial risk levels by the types of economic activity. The industries with the maximum and minimum values of the existing entrepreneurial risks have been determined. The research outcomes can be used by entrepreneurs including beginners; federal, regional and municipal departments' authorities related to the regulation of entrepreneurial activity; financial and credit, insurance, leasing organizations.
References
Astebro, T.; Herz, H.; Nanda, R. & Weber, R. A. (2014). Seeking the roots of entrepreneurship: Insights from behavioral economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 49-70.
Bakchai, T.; Mesena, D.; Miko, D.; Sep, E.; Husti, E.; Gorfan, K. & Ozimk, N. (1979). Economic risk and its methods of measurement. Economics, Мoscow.
Cantillon, R. (1997). Essai sur la nature du commerce en général. INEd.
Dana, L. P. (2002). Sustainable development in the Maldives: The Dhivehi context of entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 2(6), 557-565.
Federal State Statistics Service. Institutional changes in economy, available at: http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/enterprise/reform/ (Accessed January 16, 2019).
Gerosa, S. & Nasini, F. (2001). Project Financing and Risk Management: a new challenge for program management in the space industry of the third millennium. In Fourth European Project Management Conference, PMI Europe.
Granaturov, V. M. (2002). Economic risk: nature, measurement methods, ways to reduce. Delo and Service, Moscow.
Hall, R. E. & Woodward, S. E. (2010). The burden of the non-diversifiable risk of entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 100(3), 1163-1194.
Heyne, P. T.; Boettke, P. J. & Prychitko, D. L. (1994). The economic way of thinking. New York: Macmillan.
Kabakov, V. S. (2012). Business risks: the nature, types, management capabilities. Bulletin of Leningrad State University, 3 (6), 81-86.
Kachalov, R. M. (2002). Business risk management. Nauka. Moscow.
Kibitkin, A. I.; Rapnickaia, N. M.; Smirnov, A. V.; Skotarenko, O. V.; Drozdinina, A. I.; Bespalova, S. V.; Breslavetz, I. N.; Motina, T. N.; Gaponenkova, N. B.; Tsareva, S. V. & D. S. Boroukhin (2003). Financial analysis: risk, solvency, investments. Publishing House Academy of Natural Sciences. Moscow.
Knight, F. H. (2012). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Courier Corporation.
Lapusta, M. G. (2008). Entrepreneurship. INFRA–M. Moscow.
Lechner, C. & Gudmundsson, S. V. (2014). Entrepreneurial orientation, firm strategy and small firm performance. International Small Business Journal, 32(1), 36-60.
Nehrebecka, N. (2018). Sectoral risk assessment with particular emphasis on export enterprises in Poland. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu, 36(2), 677-700.
Pelikh, A. S.; Chumakov, A. A.; Barannikov, M. M.; Bokov, I. I.; Dreev, G. A.; Pronchenko, A. G. & Popeta G. G. (2004). Entrepreneurial activity arrangement. Information and personnel center MarT. Moscow.
Pinkovetskaia, I. S. (2018). Regularities and trends in the development of entrepreneurship in Russia. Ulyanovsk state university. Ulyanovsk.
Risk Management-Principles and guidelines (2009). International standard ISO 31000:2009.
Shapkin, A. S. (2003). Economic and finance risk. Evaluation, management, investment portfolio. Publish-trade corporation Dashkov i Ko. Moscow.
Sitkin, S. B. & Pablo, A. L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of management review, 17(1), 9-38.
Tang, Z.; Kreiser, P. M.; Marino, L. & Weaver, K. M. (2010). Exploring proactiveness as a moderator in the process of perceiving industrial munificence: a field study of SMEs in four countries. Journal of Small Business Management, 48 (2), 97–115.
Tapman, L. N. (2002). Risks in the economy. UNITI-DANA. Moscow.
Thapa, A. (2015). Determinants of microenterprise performance in Nepal. Small Business Economics, 45 (3), 581–594.
The strategy for the development of small and medium enterprises in the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030. (2016). Government Decree of June 2, 2016 No. 1083-р. Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 24. Article 3549.
Toma, S. & Alexa, I. (2012). Different Categories of Business Risk. Annals of “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati Fascicle I. Economics and Applied Informatics, 2, 109-114.
Vesković, N. (2014). Aspects of entrepreneurial risk. Finiz Singidunum University International Scientific Conference. Belgrade. Serbia. 115-117.
Wu, D. D. (Ed.). (2010). Modeling risk management in sustainable construction. Springer Science & Business Media.
Zhao, G. H. (2005). Research on the source and control of the talent entrepreneurship. Contemporary Economy and Management, 12 (4), 109-116.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All papers licensed under Creative Commons 4.0 CC-BY.- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
