The Specificity of the Text of Synthetic Nature in the Sociocultural Space of the 20th Century

Olga Yurievna Osmukhina, Ilgam Ryasimovich Kuryaev, Dmitry Ivanovich Startsev

Özet


The article considers suppositions and implementation of "figurativeness" of literature in the modern cultural context. The intersection in the process of the synthesis of arts generates polyartistic domain within the framework of a unified author's text. The phenomenon of this process has started to be examined only since the beginning of the 19th century, but examples of synthetic art can be found since Antiquity. The tendency to synthesis is inherent both in some art forms and a number of separate genres. The synthesis of different types of arts can be carried out within a particular work or at the intersection of two or more works belonging to different types of art. The very understanding of the "synthesis of arts" has undergone changes in its assimilation, but the basic principle of creating a new form remained constant. At the same time, in the" watershed" periods, the actualization of synthesis was observed, which contributed to the emergence of new artistic objects. At the same time, literature was influenced greatly and, first of all, by cinema. By the example of Boris Akunin's novels, it is possible to observe how, following the author's strategy, the novel space is filled with cinematic and illustrative imagery, which contributes to the creation of polyartistic, polysemantic in the figurative and expressive respect of the text.


Anahtar Kelimeler


Synthesis of arts, Polyartistic text visuality, Modern fiction, Akunin.

Tam Metin:

PDF (English)

Referanslar


Akunin, B. (2012). Black City: the novel. Moscow: Zakharov.

Apollo. Visual and applied art. Architecture (1997). Terminological dictionary. Moscow: Ellis Lak.

Artistic models of the universe (1997). The first book. Interaction of arts in the history of the world culture. Moscow: Nauka.

Artistic models of the universe (1999). The second book. Interaction of arts in serach of the new world image. Moscow: Nauka.

Azizyan, I. A. (2001). Dialog of the Silver age arts. Moscow: Progress-Tradition.

Azizyan, I. A. (1975). Problems of arts interaction. Moscow: Sovetskij khudozhnik.

Bazin, A. (2000). Adaptation, or the Cinema as Digest. Film Adaptation. An Anthology. 19-27. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

Branigan, E. R. (1984). Point of View in the Cinema: A Theory of Narration and subjectivity in Classical Film. Amsterdam, Berlin, New York: Mouton.

Bochkareva, N. S. (1996). Images of visual arts works in literature. Thesis abstract… Phd in Philology. Moscow.

Cleder, J. (2012). Entre littérature et cinéma: Les affinités electives. Paris: Armand Colin.

Dmitrieva, N. A. (1962). The representation and the word. Moscow: Iskusstvo.

Fedoseyenko, N. G. (2016). Literature screening: specifics of cinema genre. Saint-Petersburg.: Saint-Petersburg State University of Film and Television.

Film Adaptation. An Anthology (2000). Edited and with an introduction by James Naremore. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

Gabrichevskiy, A. G. (2002). Morphology of art. Moscow: Agraf.

Gerasimov, S. A. (1978). Cinematography and the art of word: the unquestionable and the controversial in synthesis. Interaction and synthesis of arts. 144-155. Leningrad: Nauka.

Ignatov, K. Yu. (2008). Cinematic interpretation of a literary text. Poetics of literary texts: Materials of International Scientific Conference. Vol 2. 213-220. Borisoglebsk.

Interaction and Synthesis of arts (1978). Leningrad, 1978.

Kagan, M. S. (1972). Morphology of arts. Leningrad: Iskusstvo.

Khangeldieva, I. G. (1982). Interaction and synthesis of arts. Moscow: Znanie.

Lisakovsky, I. (2002). Artistic culture: the terminological dictionary. Moscow: Izd-vo RAGS.

Literature-theatre-cinema: dialogue problems (2014). Collective monograph. Samara: Samara State University.

Literature-theatre-cinema: problems of perception and interpretation (2013). Compendium of IV All-Russian Scientific-practical conference] (Samara, 30th November-1st December 2012). Samara: Insoma-press.

Literature and cinema-in search of the common language (2013). Materials of All-Russian Scientific-practical conference, city of Vladimir, 16th -17th May, 2012. Vladimir: VlGU.

Literature and cinema-in search of the common language (2014). Materials of All-Russian Scientific-practical conference, city of Vladimir, 22nd-23rd May, 2013. Vladimir: VlGU.

Literature and cinema-in search of the common language (2015). Materials of All-Russian Scientific-practical conference, city of Vladimir, 25th-26th September, 2014. Vladimir: VlGU.

Lotman, Yu. M. (1973). Semiotics of cinema and issues of cinematic esthetics. Tallinn: Eesti Raamat.

Manevich, I. M. (1966). Cinema and literature. Moscow: Iskusstvo.

Martyanova, I. A. (2011). Cinematography of Russian text: the monograph. Saint-Petersburg: Svoye izdatelstvo.

Mikhalev, V. P. (1984). Specifics and synthesis of arts. Kiev: Nauk. dumka.

Mikhalchenko, S. A. (2001). The film-adaptation - interpretation. Moscow: VGIK.

Mikhalkovich, V. I. (1986). Art language of mass-media communications. Moscow: Nauka.

Mikhaylova, T. V. (2015). Miracle of a film interpretation. Moscow: VGIK.

Mozhaeva, T. G. (2006). Language means of the film-looking realisation in literary text. Thesis abstract…PhD in Philology. Barnaul.

Murina, E. B. (1982). Problems of the synthesis of spacious arts. Moscow: Iskusstvo.

Nemtsev, M. V. (2004). Cinematic stylistic devices in literature of Russian émigré community of the First Wave. Thesis abstract …Phd in Philology. Moscow.

Osmukhina, O. Yu. (2012). Literature and cinematography: aspects of interaction. Literature in art, art in literature. 96–103. Perm', 2012.

Osmukhina, O. Yu. & Kuryaev, I. R. (2018). Literature and Cinema: Aspects of Interaction. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, No 7 (3). 376-383.

Problemy sinteza v khudozhestvennoy culture [Problems of synthesis in artistic culture]. - Moscow, 1993. – 288 p.

Sedykh, E. V. (2009). The works of William Morris in the context of aestheticization of the Middle Ages and interaction between literature and other arts. Thesis…Doctor of Philology. Saint-Petersburg.

Shvidkovsky, O. A. (1984). Harmony of interaction. Moscow: Strojizdat.

Smely, A. S. (2007). The synthesis of spacious arts: theory. Belgorod: Otchy kray.

Stepanov, G. P. (1984). Compositional problems of the synthesis of arts. Leningrad: Hudozhnik RSFSR.

Stepanov, G. P. (1973). Interaction of arts. Leningrad: Hudozhnik RSFSR.

Stepanov, G. P. (1976). Synthesis of arts. Leningrad: O-vo "Znanie" RSFSR. Leningr. organizaciya.

Tasalov, V. I. (1978). On integrative aspects of arts interaction. Interaction and synthesis of arts. 20-43, Leningrad.

Torop, P. H. (1990). Literature and movie. The film expert’s notes: historical and theoretical journal. No 5. 9-24. Moscow.

Vanoye, F. (2011). L'adaptation littéraire au cinema. Paris: Armand Colin.

Vanslov, V. V. (1983). Aesthetics, art, art studies: theory and history. Moscow: Izobrazit. iskusstvo.

Vanslov, V. V. (1977). Visual art and music. Leningrad: Hudozhnik RSFSR.

Vlasov, V. G. (2008). New encyclopaedical dictionary of visual art. In X volumes. Vol. VIII. 826-828. Saint-Petersburg: Azbuka-klassika.

Vlasov, V. G. (1998). Styles in the art, the dictionary. Vol. 1. Saint-Petersburg: Lita.

Voloshina, T. G. (2010). Language means of the film-looking realisation in literary texts. Philology and problems of teaching foreign languages: the collection of scientific papers. No 7. 29-34. Moscow.

Zis, A. Ya. (1978). Theoretical prerequisites of the synthesis of arts. Leningrad: Nauka.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i2.2044

Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.




Telif Hakkı (c) 2019 Journal of History Culture and Art Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.