Public and Professional Discussion on the Results of the Updated Content of Subject Education: Approaches in Primary General and Basic General Education

Anna Arinushkina, Svetlana Dovbysh

Özet


The paper focuses on the updated content of subject education in Russia, discussing its outcomes among the general public and in professional circles. Thus, the topic is of high importance due to the need to obtain both the feedback and scientific synthesis of expert and professional discussions on the updated content of general education. The article analyzes foreign experience in modernization of educational standards, considers the specifics of changes and public discussions of the Federal State Educational Standard (FSES) (primary general and basic general education), public discussions of the contemporary FSES are considered as a decision-making mechanism taking into account specifics of the features of general education in Russia. The conducted research clearly demonstrates that a controversial situation has arisen: a low quality of education, a lack of transparent requirements for the content and results of education, a low level of expectations imposed on most students, leading to deep contradictions between the tasks facing the modern school. The research also shows that the educational standardization has become one of the most dynamically developing areas of educational reforms and the main trend in the development of education systems.


Anahtar Kelimeler


Updating the content of general education, Primary general education, Basic general education, Subject areas of general education, Public discussion, PISA.

Tam Metin:

PDF (English)

Referanslar


Arinushkina, A. A. & Medvedev, Ya. V. (Eds.). (2018). Systemic assessment and educational policy. Portal KURSOBR. Retrieved from https://www.kursobr.ru/opyt-i-innovatsii/505-sistemnaya-otsenka-i-obrazovatelnaya-politika.html

Baird, J.; Isaacs, T.; Johnson, S.; Stobart, G.; Yu, G.; Sprague, T. & Daugherty, R. (2011). Policy effects of PISA. Report commissioned by Pearson UK. Retrieved from http://oucea.education.ox.ac. uk/wordpress/wpcontent/uploads/2011/10/Policy-Effects-of-PISA-OUCEA.pdf

Barannikov, A. V. (2009). Reforms and standards of education in the legal context (the experience of foreign countries). Pedagogy, 4, 114-126.

Breakspear, S. (2012). The policy impact of PISA. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5k9fdfqffr28-en.pdf?expires=1544970844&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=7B0B97ECF205CB9CD47FBC0E0AE403A7

Department of Education Supervision and Control of the Republic of Tatarstan (2018) Education representatives from 13 regions of the Volga Federal District gathered in Kazan. Retrieved from http://obrnadzor.tatarstan.ru/rus/index.htm/news/1343192.htm

Dneprov, E. D. (2004). Educational standard - a tool for updating the content of general education. Educational Issues, 3, 12-32.

Ertl, H. (2006). Educational standards and the changing discourse on education: The reception and consequences of the PISA study in Germany. Oxford Review of Education, 32(5), pp. 619-634.

Fedorchuk, Yu.; Neustroyev, S. & Arinushkina, A. (2018). Independent Assessment of the Quality of Education in Russia: Results and Development Directions. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 288, 12-16. Retrieved from https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/iceder-18/55908042.

Gilmore, А. (2005). The impact of PIRLS (2001) and TIMSS (2003) in low- and middle-income countries: an assessment of the value of World Bank support for international reading literacy research (PIRLS) and mathematics and science (TIMSS). Amsterdam, Netherlands: MEA.

Committee on Education of the Government of St. Petersburg (2018). Updating the content of general education discussed at the district meeting. Retrieved from http://k-obr.spb.ru/news/news/6199/

Khavenson, T. E. & Kersha, Yu. D. (2017). Comparative analysis of the results of the PISA and TIMSS tests in Russia and European countries. Moscow, Russia: National Research University Higher School of Economics; Institute of Education.

Khutorskoy, A. V. (2011). The definition of general content and key competencies as a characteristic of the new approach to the design of educational standards. Bulletin of the Institute of Human Education, 3(1), 23-29.

Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (2018). RAE experts unanimously approved the draft new FSES of primary and basic general education. Retrieved from https://минобрнауки.рф/новости/11134.

Ministry of General and Professional Education of the Sverdlovsk Region (2018). Discussions on updating the content of education. Retrieved from http://minobraz.egov66.ru/news/show/id/205

Miroshnikova, O. Kh. (2015). Standards based education. Continuing Education: XXI Century, 2(10), pp. 19-23.

Nizienko, E. & Shmelkova, L. (2010). The introduction of new state educational standards of general education. Educational Policy, 1-2, 108-113.

Ministry of Enlightenment of Russia (2018). Order No. 228 of the Ministry of Enlightenment of Russia dated November 19, 2018. Moscow.

Oregon Department of Education (2010). Academic content standards: Creating consistency across Oregon. Retrieved from http://www.ode.state.or.us/pubs/eii/academiccontentstandardsprimer.pdf

Presidential Executive Office (2017). Order Pr-209 on general education. Retrieved from http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/assignments/orders/53845

Rostov Institute for Advanced Studies and Professional Retraining of Educators (2018). District meeting. Retrieved from http://ripkro.ru/news/main_news/

Savina, A. K. (2014). Education in the European Union. Problems of modern education, 2.

Takayama, K. (2008). International league table politics: PISA in the debate about the achievements of Japan crisis. Comparative Education, 44(4), 387-407.

The Ministry of Education of the Novosibirsk Region (2018). Sergey Fedorchuk took part in the district meeting on the issues of updating the content of general education. Retrieved from http://minobr.nso.ru/news/8524

Voskresenskaya, N. M. (2004). Experience in developing educational standards in foreign countries. Education Issues, 3, 76-88.

Zabrodin, Yu. M. & Gayazova, L. A. (2013). The standard of professional activity of a teacher: problems of public and professional discussion. Psychological Science and Education, 3, 29-37. Retrieved from http://www. psyedu.ru




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i1.1943

Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.




Telif Hakkı (c) 2019 Journal of History Culture and Art Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.