Breakdown of the Anglo-Saxon Model of Globalization

Arkady I. Izvekov

Özet


The most advanced societies have no newly-needed democratic formations, as legally unsecured intellectual freedom may be usurped by powerful institutions having a formal respect for the old democratic principles. Generally, this means that we are witnessing not just personality changes, but tectonic shifts in the legal and political strata that existed and developed within the period of Modernity. The purpose of this research is to identify the features of current crisis in the Anglo-Saxon globalization. This goal can be achieved on the back of classical philosophy and large-scale historical material applied simultaneously. This approach demonstrates that globalization processes are still guided by the legacy of early English history and the ideas that originated during the Age of Enlightenment. Anglo-Saxon Model discredits itself and, consequently, becomes non-legitimate when it comes to its supreme right to interpret the idea of democracy. An important aspect of this research is how the religious trends of the 17th century were interwoven with political, legal and cultural consequences.


Anahtar Kelimeler


The Enlightenment, History of economic thought, Cultural crisis, Pragmatic and existential spheres of personality, Democracy.

Tam Metin:

PDF (English)

Referanslar


Adorno, T. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. Harper & Row.

Beer, M. (1940). A History of British Socialism. In Two Volumes. London: G. Allen & Unwin.

Bentham, J. (2000). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Kitchener, Ontario: Batoche Books.

Bielsa, E. (2012). Beyond hybridity and authenticity: Globalisation, translation and the cosmopolitan turn in the social sciences. Synthesis, 4, 17-35.

Bird, Ch. (1841). A Plea for the Reformed Church, or Observations on a plain and most important declaration of the Tractarians in the "British Critic" for July. London: J. Hatchard and Son.

Bosanquet, B. (1958). The Philosophical Theory of the State. New York: Macmillan & Co. Ltd.

Bradley, F. H. (1893). Appearance and Reality. London: Swan Sonnenschein.

Collingwood, R. (1964). Essays in the Philosophy of Art. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Dicey, A. V. (2017). Lectures on the relation between law and public opinion in England during the nineteenth century. Routledge.

Docquier, F. & Hillel, R. (2012). Globalization, Brain Drain, and Development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50, 681-730.

Ferro, M. J. (2017). Anglo-Saxon imperialism through cultural goods: Titles suggested for young readers in Portugal. Cadernos de Tradução, 37(1), 139-158.

Fromm, E. (1940). Escape from Freedom. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.

Gardiner, S. (1895). The first two Stuarts and the Puritan revolution, 1603-1660. New York: C. Scribner's sons.

Globalization (2003). Globalistics. Encyclopedia. Moscow: Rainbow.

Gordon, D. A. (2016). Against Old Europe: Critical Theory and Alter-Globalisation Movements.

Henrekson, M. & Jakobsson, U. (2003). The transformation of ownership policy and structure in Sweden: Convergence towards the Anglo-Saxon Model? New Political Economy, 8(1), 73-102.

Hobhouse, L. (1925). Morals in Evolution; a Study in Comparative Ethics. New York: H. Holt and Co.

Jennings, J. (2006). France and the ‘Anglo-Saxon’ Model: Contemporary and Historical Perspectives. European Review, 14(4), 537-554.

Kant, I. (1995). Essays and Treatises on Moral, Political and Various Philosophical Subjects, chapter ‘Of the Injustice of Counterfeiting Books’.

Komori, N. (2015). Beneath the globalization paradox: Towards the sustainability of cultural diversity in accounting research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 26, 141-156

Kumar, A. H. (2012). The power of thought and potential of globalization of scientific research to overcome political and economic limitations. Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine, 3(2), 111.

Lerner, M. (1961). America as a Civilization. Vol. 2, In 2 Volumes. New York: Simon and Schuster.

MacLean, J. (2000). Philosophical roots of globalization and philosophical routes to globalization. In Globalization and its Critics (pp. 3-66). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Marcuse, H. (1964). One Dimension Man. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Mélitz, J. (2015). English as a Global Language. Working Paper (Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh).

Mill, J. S. (2001). Utilitarianism. Kitchener, Ontario: Batoche Books.

Morley, J. (1901). On Compromise. London: Macmillan and Co.

Schiller, H. (1907) Studies in Humanism. New York: Macmillan & Co. Ltd.

Seeley, J. (1914). The Expansion of England. London: Macmillan and Co.

Spencer, H. (1978). The Principles of Ethics. Vol 1, In 2 Vol. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

Strachey, G. L. (1948). Elizabeth and Essex. A Tragic Story. London.

Taine, H. (1957). Notes on England. London: Thames and Hudson.

Trevelyan, G. (1937). British History in the Nineteenth Century and After (1782–1919). London: Green and Co.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v7i5.1904

Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.




Telif Hakkı (c) 2018 Journal of History Culture and Art Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.