Tatar Philistine Family of Kazan in the Middle of the XIX Century
Keywords:Philistinism, Historical demography, Tatar family, Typology, Population, Marriage, Household.
The article examines the demographic and socio-economic characteristics of the Tatar bourgeois family of Kazan in the middle of the XIX century in the era of transition to bourgeois society. Studying the philistine family allows one to get an idea of the way of life of the townspeople, since philistinism was the most massive layer of the urban population of Russia in this period. Kazan, being a multi-confessional and multinational city, along with Russian residents, included the Tatar population in the urban society. The study of the Tatar philistine family makes it possible to reveal the features of the way of life of this category of urban inhabitants, distinguishing it from the Russian philistines of Kazan.
Approaches to the study of this issue are based on methods used in microhistory using historical and demographic analysis tools. The study showed that the Tatar philistine family in its structure, demographic characteristics, occupation, standard of living as a whole led a way of life typical of this class group of Russian society of the period under study. However, petty bourgeois Tatars retained a number of features determined by national traditions.
Bessonova T. V. (1999). Kazanskaya Sukonnaya Sloboda in the XVIII - the first half of the XIX centuries. Naberezhnye Chelny: Publishing house of the Institute of Management.
Campbell C. (2012). Historical Demography. California Center for Population Research. On-Line Working Paper Series.
Ginzburg K. (2004). Microhistory: two or three things that I know about it. Myths - emblems - signs: morphology and history. Digest of articles. Moscow, New publishing house.
Goncharov Yu. M. (1999). Merchant family of the second half of the XIX - early XX centuries. Moscow.
Hildermeier M. (1986). Bűrgertum und Stadt in Russland, 1760-1870: Rechtliche Lage und soziale Structur. Köln, Wien: Bölau Verlag.
Imhof F. Hrsg. (1975). Historische Demographie als Sozialgeschichte. Darmstadt und Marburg.
Kamensky A. B. (2007). Daily routine of Russian urban inhabitants: Historical anecdotes from the provincial life of the XVIII century. Moscow.
Kaplunovski A. A. (2015). Social Phantom: Meshchanstvo in the Socio-Cultural Context of Late Imperial Russia // Ab imperio [Electronic resource]. Access mode: http://abimperio.net/portal/outreach/AKberlin.pdf (Access date 26.08.2015).
Laslett P. (1979). Family and household: historical approach. Marriage, birth rate, family for three centuries. Moscow: Statistics. NART F. 570. Op. 1. D.1.
Letter of Herzen A. I. & Zakharina N. A. (1957). April 22, 1835. Letter from the province. Herzen AI. Selected works. Moscow: Nauka.
Mironov B. N. (2003). Social history of Russia during the period of the empire (XVIII - early XX centuries.). St. Petersburg: "Dmitry Bulanin", T. 1.
National Archive of the Republic of Tatarstan (hereinafter NART). F. 570. Op. 1. D.29.
Pajitnov K. A. (1952). The problem of craft shops in the legislation of Russian absolutism. Moscow.
Repina L. P. (2009). "New historical science" and social history. Moscow: Publishing house LCI.
Rieber A. J. (1991). The Sedimentary Society. Edith W. Clowes, Samuel D. Kassow, and James L. West, eds. Between Tsar and People: Educated Society and the Quest for Public Identity in the Late Imperial Russia. Prinseton.
Uvarov P. Yu. (2004). France of the XVI century: Experience in reconstruction through notarial acts. Moscow: Nauka.
Virtshafter E. (2002). Social structures: commoners in the Russian Empire. Moscow: Logos.
How to Cite
LicenseAll papers licensed under Creative Commons 4.0 CC-BY.
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.