State Legal Thought in Russia 19th - Early 20th Centuries in Monographs and Scientific Papers: The Experience of Systemic Examination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v7i3.1749Keywords:
State-legal doctrines, Monograph, Scientific paper, Russian empire, Form of scientific knowledge.Abstract
The paper presents the results of the next stage of a comprehensive study concerning Russian state-legal doctrines in the 19th and early 20th centuries, taken in the triune of the external form of their expression: in dissertations, in monographs and in scientific papers of the periodical legal press. The authors analyzed the content and results of publication of monographs and the most famous papers published by pre-revolutionary Russian political scientists on key aspects of the state (constitutional) law science. Data are presented on the main priority areas of research, poorly developed fields of public law science, the laws of genesis and evolution, respectively, of monographic and periodical state-legal doctrines. The methodology proposed for the identification, analysis and general theoretical evaluation of state-legal doctrines has every reason to be applied for obtaining comprehensive knowledge of other branch pre-revolutionary legal doctrines.
References
Alekseev, A. S. (1895). To the doctrine on the legal nature of a state and the state power. Moscow: Printing house of the Literature Partnership I. N. Kushneryrev and Co.
Apolsky, E. A. & Mordovtsev, A. Yu. (2017). Civil law doctrines in thesis research of universities of the Russian Empire [Text]: monograph. Moscow: Yurlitinform.
Apolsky, E. A.; Mamychev, A. Yu.; Mordovtsev, A. Yu. & Trigub, G. Ya. (2017). The legal and methodological foundations of the thesis development of legal doctrines in Russia (XIX - early XX centuries). Genesis: historical research, 12, 110-117.
Apolsky, E.; Baranov, P.; Mamychev, A.; Mordovtsev, A. & Ovchinnikov, A. (2017). Doctrinal and Legal Developments of the State Law Institutions in the Context of the Russian Legal Mentality (XIX - Early XX Centuries). Man in India, 97(23), 105-113.
Apolsky, E.; Baranov, P.; Mamychev, A.; Mordovtsev, A. & Vronskaya, M. (2017). The Legal and Methodological Foundations of the Dissertation Development of Legal Doctrines in Russia (XIX - Early XX Centuries). Man in India, 97(23), 329-338.
Epstein, D. Z. (2014). Rationality, Legitimacy, & The Law. Washington University Jurisprudence Review, 7(1). URL: http://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_jurisprudence/vol7/iss1/5
Gee, G. & Webber, G. C. N. (2013). Rationalism in public Law. Modern Law Review, 76(4), 708-734.
Gradovsky, A. D. (1871). Episode from the history of church administration. Politics, history and administration. Critical and political papers by A. Gradovsky. St. Petersburg: publication of M. O. Wolff.
Habermas, J. (1981). Rationalisierung des Rechts und Gegenwartsdiagnose. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Bd. 1: Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung, (pp. 332-366). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Kroeze, IJ. (2013). Legal research methodology and the dream of interdisciplinarity. PER [online], 16(3), Available from: http://www.scielo.org.za [cited 2018-03-13],
Kuplevassky, N. O. (1888). Public service in theory and in the existing law of England, France, Germany and Cisleitan Austria: Disciplinary responsibility. State exams. Limits of obedience of private persons to orders of officials. Kharkiv: Printing house of M.F. Zilberberg.
Shapovalov, V. A. & Yakushev, A. N. (1918). Comprehensive program of scientific research "History of degrees in Russia: the XVIII century. - 1918". Moscow.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All papers licensed under Creative Commons 4.0 CC-BY.- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
