<b>Büyükbaş Hayvan Atıkları için Kurulacak Havasız Çürütme Tesisinin Ekonomik Analizi</b> / The Economical Analysis of Cattle Manure Treatment by Anaerobic Digestion Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v1i4.143Keywords:
Biyogaz, büyükbaş hayvan atıkları, geri ödeme periyodu, havasız çürütme, Biogas, cattle manure, payback period, anaerobic digestionAbstract
Büyükbaş hayvan atıkları, içeriğindeki yüksek katı madde, organik kirlilik ve patojen mikroorganizmalar sebebiyle halk sağlığı açısından olumsuz etkiler yapabilecek bir atıktır. Bu çalışmada havasız çürütme ile atıkların stabilize edilerek biyogaz elde edilmesi ve çürümüş atıkların toprakta doğal gübre olarak kullanılmasını içeren bir yönetim modeli uygulanmıştır. Bunun için pilot ölçekli bir havasız çürütme reaktörü işletilmiş ve çürümüş atıklar çeşitli dozlarda yonca, Macar fiğ ve arpa karışımı ile mısır silajı bitkilerinin ekildiği alanlarda doğal gübre olarak toprağa eklenmiştir. Havasız çürütme işleminde yarımcı materyal olarak mısır silajı da reaktöre beslenmiştir. Çalışma sonunda elde edilen sonuçlar ve literatür yardımıyla 1000 baş hayvan için kurulum ve işletme maliyetleri hesaplanmıştır. Kurulum maliyeti; elektrik üretim sisteminin kurulup kurulmaması açısından iki farklı değer olarak hesaplanmıştır. İşletme maliyetleri farklı tarla ürünleri ve yine elektrik sisteminin kurulup kurulmaması açılarından çeşitli durumlar için hesaplanmıştır. Sonuç olarak elde edilen en iyi sonuçlara göre; çürümüş atıklar Macar fiğ ve arpa karışımı bitkisinin ekiminde kullanıldığında kurulacak tesisin elektrik üretim sistemi de kurulduğunda 2,5 yılda, elektrik üretim sistemi kurulmadığında ise 2,1 yılda kendisini amorti ettiği bulunmuştur. The Economical Analysis of Cattle Manure Treatment by Anaerobic Digestion Process Cattle manure is a potential for causing detrimental effects on human health due to its high solid matter and pathogen microorganism content. In this study, it was aimed to achieve biogas production by stabilizing the waste using anaerobic digestion. Digested waste was utilized as natural fertilizer. For that reason, a pilot-scale anaerobic digestion tank was operated and digested wastes were added to soil in diverse dosages where alfalfa, the mixture of Hungarian vetch and barley and corn silage are planted. Corn silage was fed to the reactor as a supplementary material during anaerobic digestion process. Installation and operating costs are determined for 1,000 cattle by the results obtained and the literature datas. Installation cost was evaluated considering both installed electricity producted system and non-installed electricity producted system. As a result, according to best results, the system would pay for itself in 2. 5 years when electricity production system is installed while the system is not installed, the pay off would be realized in 2. 1 years for the mixture of Hungarian vetch and barley.References
Aitken, M. D. , Sobsey, M. D. , Van Abel, A. D. , Blauth, K. E. , Singleton, D. R. , Crunk, P. L. ,
Nichols, C. , Walters, G. W. ve Schneider, M. (2007). “Inactivation of Escherichia Coli O157:H7
during Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Manure from Dairy Cattle”, Water Research,
:1659-1666.
Atallah, T. , Andreux, F. , Choné, T. ve Gras, F. (1995). “Effect of Storage and Composting on
the Properties and Degradability of Cattle Manure”, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment,
(3): 203-213.
Bhattacharya, T. K. ve Mishra, T. N. (2003). “Biodegradability of Dairy Cattle Manure under
Dry Anaerobic Fermentation Process”, Journal of Institution of Engineers, 84:9-11.
Brandón, M. G. , Lazcano, C. ve Domínguez, J. (2008). “The evaluation of Stability and Maturity
During the Composting of Cattle Manure”, Chemosphere, 70 (3):436-444.
Demirci, G. G. ve Demirer G. N. (2004). “Effect of Initial COD Concentration, Nutrient
Addition, Temperature and Microbial Acclimation on Anaerobic Treatability of Broiler and
Cattle Manure”, Bioresource Technology, 93:109-117.
Demirer, G. ve Chen, S. (2004). “Effect of Retention Time and Organic Loading Rate on
Anaerobic Acidification and Biogasification of Dairy Manure”, Journal of Chemical Technology
and Biotechnology, 79:1381-1387.
Demirer, G. ve Chen, S. (2005). “Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Manure in a Hybrid Reactor
With Biogas Recirculation”, World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 21:1509-1514.
Dugba, P. N. ve Zhang, R. (1999). “Treatment of Dairy Wastewater with Two-Stage Anaerobic
Sequencing Batch Reactor Systems - Thermophilic Versus Mesophilic Operations”, Bioresource
Tehnology, 68:225-233.
El-Mashad, H. M. , Zeeman, g. , Van Loon, W. K. P. , Bot G. P. A. ve Lettinga, G. (2004).
“Effect of temperature and temperature fluctuation on thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle
manure”, Bioresource Technology, 95:191–201.
Harikishan S. and Sung, S. (2003). “Cattle Waste Treatment and Class a Biosolid Production
Using Temperature-Phased Anaerobic Digester”, Advances in Environmental Research, 7: 701-
Kalyuzhnyi, S. , Sklyar, V. , Fedorovich, V. , Kovalev, A. , Nozhevnikova, A. ve Klapwijk, A.
(1999). “The Development of Biological Methods for Utilisation and Treatment of Diluted
Manure Streams”, Water Science and Technology, 40(1):223-229.
Keshtkar, A. , Ghaforian, H. , Abolhamd, G. ve Meyssami, B. (2001). “Dynamic Simulation of
Cyclic Batch Anaerobic Digestion of Cattle Manure”, Bioresource Technology, 80:9-17.
Larney, F. J. ve Hao, X. (2007). “A review of Composting as a Management Alternative for Beef
Cattle Feedlot Manure in Southern Alberta, Canada”, Bioresource Technology, 98(17)3221-3227.
Martin, J. H. (2004). “A Comparison of Dairy Cattle Manure Management with and without
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Utilization”, AgSTAR Programme US EPA, 17 Haziran 2004,
Washington.
Parkinson, R. , Gibbs, P. , Burchett, S. ve Misselbrook, T. (2004). “Effect of Turning Regime and
Seasonal Weather Conditions on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Losses During Aerobic Composting
of Cattle Manure”, Bioresource Technology, 91(2):171-178.
Shiraishi, M. , Wakimoto, N. , Takimoto, E. , Kobayashi, H. ve Osada, T. (2006). “Measurement
and Regulation of Environmentally Hazardous Gas Emissions from Beef Cattle Manure
Composting”, International Congress Series, 1293:303-306.
Hayvansal Atık Yönetimi adlı 106G026 numaralı TÜBİTAK KAMAG Projesi Sonuç Raporu
(2012).
USDA Rural Development. (2009). “Cooperative Approaches for Implementation of Dairy
Manure Digesters”, Araştırma Raporu 217.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All papers licensed under Creative Commons 4.0 CC-BY.- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
