Multidisciplinary Assessment of Citizenship Approach in Modern Law and Problem of “Denaturalisation” on the Basis of Law and Communication

Ayhan Dolunay, Gökçe Keçeci

Özet


Through the provision of general definition for the concepts of “modernisation” with many dimensions and “law”1 as there is no main consensus on the doctrine, our study discussed the concept of “modern law” reached through the related impacts” and addressed the issue of “denaturalisation”, which is defined as “against the modern law system” in the field of “cizitezenship law” as one of the modern law domains covering various concepts within, and is not under the scope of European Convention on Nationality and Turkish Law, however is covered under the applicable citizenship law of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus and under the new law on citizenship aiming the revision of existing law and elaborated that the related issue is not only constitute a question of law but also with another significant aspect harms the communication and relationship between state-individual and state and other states/international organizations. Consequently, our study delivered concrete proposals to eliminate/prevent the divergences caused by the relevant organisation regarding the legal, communication and other domains of social sciences.


Anahtar Kelimeler


Modern law, Citizenship, Denaturalisation, Legal, Communicative, Multidisciplinary.

Tam Metin:

PDF (English)

Referanslar


Anthony, A. (2005). Handbook Of International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Armaoğlu, F. (1989). 20. Yüzyıl Siyasî Tarihi 1914-1980. Ankara: Timas Press

Aybay, A. et al. (2013). Hukuka Giriş [Introduction to Law]. İstanbul: İstanbul, Bilgi University Press.

Aybay, R. (2006). “Kamusal Uluslararası Hukuk Açısından Devletin Tanınması” [Recognition of the State in terms of Public International Law], MTÜHFD, 2, 3-18.

Aybay, R. & Özkek, N. (2015). Vatandaşlık Hukuku [Citizenship Law]. İstanbul: Bilgi University Press.

Bahar, İ. B. (2009). Sosyoloji [Sociology]. Ankara: Hayat Press

Berki, O. F. (1970). Devletler Hususi Hukuku [Private International Law]. Ankara, Güzel Sanatlar Press.

Çelik, F. E. (1968). Milletlerarası Hukuk [Private International Law]. İstanbul: İstanbul University Faculty of Law Press.

Crozat, C. (1953). Devletler Hukukunda Tanıma [Recognition in Private International Law], (Trans. Edip Çelik), İÜHFD, C. XIX, S. 1-2, 3-32.

Deflem M. (1996). Habermas, Modernity and Law. London: Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Deflem, M. (2014). Habermas’ın İletişimsel Eylem Kuramı’nda Hukuk [Introduction: Law in Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action], (Trans. Ülker Yükselbaba), İÜHFM, 7(1), 877-894.

Doğan, V. (2012). Türk Vatandaşlık Hukuku [Turkish Citizenship Law]. Ankara: Savaş Press.

Dolunay, A. (2015). Vatandaşlık Hukuku Temel İlkelerinin Türk Hukuku ve Kıbrıs Türk Hukuku Açısından Değerlendirilmesi [The Evaluation of the Principles of Nationality Law in Turkish Law and Cypriot Turkish Law], Turkish Bar Association Journal, January-February 2016, 369-417.

Dolunay, A. (2015). Türk Hukukunda ve Kıbrıs Türk Hukukunda Yabancı Mahkeme Kararlarının Tanınması ve Tenfizi [Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Turkish Law and Cypriot Turkish Law]. İstanbul: On İki Levha Yayıncılık.

Ekinci, B. E. (2006). İslam Hukuku [Islamic Law]. İstanbul, Arı Sanat Publishing.

Fişek, H. (1959). Türk Vatandaşlık Hukuku [Turkish Citizenship Law]. Ankara: Ankara University Faculty of Law Press.

Gewirth, A. (2011). Siyaset Felsefesi [Philosophy of Politics] (Trans. Ahmet Kesgı̇n), AÜİFD, 52(1), 349-379.

Göğer, E. (1970). Devletler Hususi Hukukunun Mahiyeti [Nature of the Private International Law], AÜHFD, 3-4, 173-192.

Göğer, E. (1979). Türk Tabiiyet Hukuku [Turkish Citizenship Law]. Ankara: Sevinç Press.

Gürkan, Ü. (1988). Montesque ve Kanunların Ruhu (Hukuk Sosyolojisi Açısından Bir Değerlendirme)” [Montesquieu and the Spirit of Laws (An Assessment in terms of Law Sociology)], Ankara University Faculty of Law Journal, 40(1), 9-31.

Hoecke, V. M. (2002). Law as Communication. Belgium: Hart Publishing.

Işıktaç, Y. (1998). Bir Hukuk Tanımı Vermenı̇n Zorunluluğu [Obligation of Giving The Law Defination], Gazi University Faculy of Law Journal, 2(1-2), Retrieved from: http://webftp.gazi.edu.tr/hukuk/dergi/2_16.pdf

Janis, M. (1988). An Introduction to International Law. Boston: Aspen Publishers.

Kara, C. (2016). Değişen Birey-Devlet İlişkileri Bağlamında Sosyal Bilgiler, Vatandaşlık ve İnsan Hakları Eğitimi [Social Studies, Citizenship and Human Rights Education in the context of Changing Individual-State Relations], Kilis 7 Aralık University Journal of Social Science, 6(1), June, 20-51.

Kelsen, H. (1952). Principles of International Law. New York: Rinehart Publishing.

Koşum, A. 2004. “Osmanlı Örfi Hukukunun İslam Hukukundaki Temelleri” [Fundamental Principles of Islamic Law of Ottoman Customary Law], SUİFD, 1(17), 145-160.

Meray, S. (1960). Devletler Hukukuna Giriş [Introduction to International Law]. Ankara: Faculty of Politics Press.

Modern Kelime Kökeni [Origin of the Modern], (n.d.). Retrieved from: http://www.etimolojiturkce.com/kelime/modern

Modernleşme Sürecinde Hukuk [Law in Modernization Process], (n.d.). Retrieved from: http://sosyolojisi.com/modernlesme-surecinde-hukuk/4401.html

Nomer, E. (2014). Vatandaşlık Hukuku [Citizenship Law], İstanbul: Filiz Bookstore.

Özden Atakul, (n.d.). Modernlik ve Modernleşme [Modernity and Modernization], Retrieved from: http://80.251.40.59/education.ankara.edu.tr/aksoy/ere/oatakul.doc

Özsunay, E. (1979). Medeni Hukuka Giriş, İstanbul: Güryay Press.

Rona, A. & Nimet, Ö. (2015). Vatandaşlık Hukuku [Citizenship Law]. İstanbul: Bilgi University Press.

Seldağ, G. C. (2004). Roma Hukukunun Günümüz Hukuk Düzenlerı̇ne Etkı̇sı̇ [The Impact of the Roman Law on Today's Legal Arrangements], GÜHFD, 8(1-2), 75-93.

Talmon, S. (1998). Recognition of Governments in International Law: With Particular Reference to Governments in Exile. Oxford Clarendon Press.

Tamçelik, S. (2013). BM Güvnenlik Konseyi’nin Kıbrıs’la İlgili Aldığı Bazı Kararların Özellikleri ve Analitik Değerlendirmesi (1964-1992) [The Properties of Some Resolutions Adopted By the Un Security Council Regarding Cyprus and Their Analytical Evaluation (1964-1992)], Turkish Studies - International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, I. 8(12), 1229-1268.

Turhan T. & Tanrıbilir, F. (2010). Vatandaşlık Hukuku Ders Notları [Course Notes of Citizenship Law]. Ankara: Yetkin Publishing.

Uluocak-Erdener, N. (1968). Türk Vatandaşlık Hukuku [Turkish Citizenship Law], İstanbul: İstanbul: İstanbul University Faculty of Law Press.

Ulusoy, M. D. (2015). Cumhuriyet Öncesi Türk Modernleşmesi [Turkish Modernization before the Republic], Sociology Conference, 1(52), 511-558.

Yüksel, M. (2002). Modernleşme Bağlamında Hukuk ve Etik İlişkisine Sosyolojik Bir Bakış [A Sociological View of the Relationship between Law and Ethics in the Context of Modernization], Ankara University Faculty of Social Sciences Journal, 57(1), 177-195.

Yükselbaba, Ü. (2008). Habermas’ın Prosedüralist Hukuk Paradigması, Haklar Sistemi ve Hukuk Devleti [Habermas's Procedurealist Law Paradigm, Rights System and the Constitutional State], İstanbul Univeristy Faculty of Law Journal, 66(1), 221-252.

What is Law? (n.d.). Black’s Law Dictionary, Online 2.nd Edt. Retrieved from: http://thelawdictionary.org/law/




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i4.1094

Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.




Telif Hakkı (c) 2017 Journal of History Culture and Art Research

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2147-0626