Motivational Projections of Russian Spontaneous Speech
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i3.1022Keywords:
Spoken language, oral communication, semantics, contextual meanings, pragmatics, connotation, nomination, derivation, language personality, creativity, cultural knowledge, linguistic taste.Abstract
The article deals with the semantic, pragmatic and structural features of words, phrases, dialogues motivation, in the contemporary Russian popular speech. These structural features are characterized by originality and unconventional use. Language material is the result of authors` direct observation of spontaneous verbal communication between people of different social and age groups. The words and remarks were analyzed in compliance with the communication system of national Russian language and cultural background of popular speech. Studies have discovered that in spoken discourse there are some other ways to increase the expression statement. It is important to note that spontaneous speech identifies lacunae in the nominative language and its vocabulary system. It is proved, prefixation is also effective and regular way of the same action presenting. The most typical forms, ways and means to update language resources as a result of the linguistic creativity of native speakers were identified.
References
Clark, H. H., & Wasow, Th., (1998). Repeating Words in Spontaneous Speech. Volume 37, Issue 3: 201-242.
De Cock, S., (1998). A Recurrent Word Combination Approach to the Study of Formulae in the Speech of Native and Non-Native Speakers of English Source. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 3: 59-80.
Harchenko, V. K., (2016). Antologiya razgovornoj rechi. Nekotorye aspekty teorii. Moskva: Menand. T.1. Agrammatizmy – kreaciya, pp.: 224. T.2. Litota – percepciya, p. 232. T.3. Povtor – slovotvorchestvo, p. 216. T. 4. Somatizmy – yumor, p. 216. T.5. Monologi, p. 184. (In Russian).
Krongauz, M. (2009). Russkij yazyk na grani nervnogo sryva. Moskva: Znak, p. 480. (In Russian).
Nagorny, I. A., (2015). Aktualizacionaya functia modalnih edinic v viskazivanii. Nauchnie Vedomisti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universuteta, No. 6 (203). Vip. 30: 13-20. (In Russian).
Ogneva, E. A., Danilenko, I. A., Kireeva, Y. I., & Kutsenko, A. A., (2015). Interpretative Model of Linguacultural Knowledge. The Social Sciences, 10: 1101-1106.
Potebnya, A. A., (2007). Mysl i yazyk. Moskva: Labirint, p. 265. (In Russian).
Potebnya, A. A., (2007). Mysl i yazyk. Moskva: Labirint, p. 265. (In Russian).
Rabiner, L. R., & Juang, B. H., (1993). Fundamentals of speech recognition.
Rey, A., (1995). The Concept of Neologism and the Evaluation of Terminologies in Individual Languages Text. John Benjamins Press, p. 124.
Vinogradov, V. V., (1995). Slovo i znachenie kak predmet istoriko-leksikologicheskogo issledovaniya. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 1: 5-37. (In Russian).
Ward, W., (1989). Understanding spontaneous speech. Mellon University. Proceedings of the workshop on Speech and Natural Language: 137-141.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All papers licensed under Creative Commons 4.0 CC-BY.- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.