Urban Cultural Space in the Context of Evolutionism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i1.2481

Keywords:

Urban cultural space, Evolutionary approach, Cultural diffusion, Urban studies.

Abstract

Attempts to determine the essence of urban culture were made in the framework of different approaches: civilizational, philosophical, anthropological, sociological, and others. This article is concerned with the analysis of the urban cultural space phenomenon from the evolutionary point of view. Originating as the first ethnographic theory in the works of German historian Friedrich Gustav Klemm, cultural evolutionism was further developed in the evolutionary theory of cultural development, the founder of which is the English ethnologist Edward Burnett Tylor. The problems of the evolutionary theory of culture were widely discussed in scientific circles and found common ground with such ideas as the “axial age” concept by Karl Jaspers and the doctrine of the noosphere. Some common points in understanding the synergistic mechanisms of cultural activities can be found in the holistic "philosophy of integrity". An evolutionary analysis of urban cultural space remains relevant today. In this article, we analyze the possibility of studying the processes of cultural transformation in the context of changes in the forms of joint social life, developing from the incoherent homogeneous structure of ancient human settlements to the complex heterogeneous structure of modern highly urbanized urban communities. Also, we attempted to justify the advisability of applying the evolutionary approach to the analysis of the laws of formation, development and improvement of the cultural space of modern cities.

Author Biographies

Viktoriia Freidlina, International Humanitarian University, Odesa, Ukraine

Ассистент Международного гуманитарного университета, факультет гуманитарных и гуманитарных наук

Tetiana Uvarova

Ассистент Международного гуманитарного университета, факультет гуманитарных и гуманитарных наук, кандидат искусствоведения, доцент Международного гуманитарного университета, факультет гуманитарных и гуманитарных наук

References

Carmine, A. S. (2003). Cultural studies. Saint Petersburg.

Eco, U. (2006). Absent structure. Doing semiology. Saint Petersburg.

Glazychev, V. (2008). Urban Studies Part 1. Moscow.

Gutnov, A. E., & Glazychev, V. L. (1990). The world of architecture. The face of the city. Moscow.

Ivanov, S. A. (2002). Methods of studying culture: a training manual. Velikiy Novgorod.

Kagan, M. S. (1996). The philosophy of culture. Saint Petersburg.

Karpovets, M. W. (2013). City as a world of human being: philosophical and anthropological analysis: thesis for the degree of Candidate of Philosophy. Kyiv.

Landry, Ch. (2018). Creative City. Moscow.

Lotman, Yu. M. (1992). Culture and explosion. Moscow.

Markova, A. N. (ed.) (2000). Culturology. History of world culture: a textbook for universities. Moscow.

Moiseev, N. N. (1997). Co-evolution of nature and society. Ways of noospherogenesis. Ecology and life, 2-3.

Molchanov, V. (2011). Constitution of space. Judgment and body. Questions of Philosophy, 10.

Rodin, S. N. (1991). The idea of co-evolution. Novosibirsk

Simmel, G. (2018). Big cities and spiritual life. Strelka Press.

Teilhard de Chardin, P. (2002). The phenomenon of man: a collection of essays and essays. Moscow.

Toynbee, A. J. (2009). History Research: The Emergence, Growth, and Disintegration of Civilizations. Moscow.

Trubina, E. G. (2011). The city in theory: experiments in understanding space. Moscow.

Windelbland, W. (1998). From Kant to Nietzsche: The history of the new philosophy in its connection with the general culture and individual sciences. Moscow.

Yargina, Z. N. (1991). The aesthetics of the city. Moscow.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-31

How to Cite

Freidlina, V., & Uvarova, T. (2020). Urban Cultural Space in the Context of Evolutionism. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 9(1), 458-467. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i1.2481