Signs of State and Their Historical Modifications

Authors

  • Valentin Ya. Lyubashits
  • Nikolay V. Razuvaev
  • Alexey Yu. Mamychev
  • Sergey S. Shestopal
  • Benedyk V. I.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v7i3.1746

Keywords:

The State, Definition of the State, Statehood, Government, Sovereignty, Political power, Political nation, Imperium, Dominium, Essence and legal nature of the State, State power.

Abstract

This study considers various historical types of the state and implementation of their universal characteristics by implementing a comparative analysis. It is shown that the traditional state had a private-law basis; a basis of the states of modern type is the public law; in the traditional state the territory acted in the form of the earth belonging to the state on the right of the supreme property; in the modern state - as geographical space to which its power extends; supremacy of the traditional state was shown in the form of sovereignty, and the state of modern type - sovereignty; the power of the traditional state has property (personal), and the modern state - political (public) character. Historical types of the state differently realize its universal characteristics, getting the special signs which are historical modifications of these characteristics in the course of evolution.

References

Alayev, L. B. (2002). East history. In 6 t. T. 2. The East in the Middle Ages / Chief editor L. B. Alayev, K. Z. Ashrafyan. M, Page 619; Sociocultural (archetypical and mental) foundations of the public and power organization of society. Мoscow: RIOR, INFRA-M.

Alekseev, A. S. (1894). To the doctrine about the legal nature of the state and the government. Moscow.

Alekseev, A. S. (1910). To a question of the legal nature of the power of the monarch in the constitutional state. Yaroslavl.

Ashburner, W. (1909). The Rhodian Sea Law. Oxford.

Avdeenkova, M. P. & Dmitriyev, Yu. A. (2005). Bases of the theory of constitutional right. Moscow.

Baburin, S. N. (1997). State territory: legal and geopolitical problems. Moscow.

Bakhrakh, D. N.; Rossinsky, B. V. & Starilov, Yu. N. (2004). Administrative law. Moscow.

Belyakovich, E. V. (2006). About a concept of the territory of the state. The Siberian legal messenger, 2(29).

Berndt, R. M. (1970). Man, Land and Myth North Australia. Sydney.

Bryce, J. (1978). The Holy Roman Empire. London.

Bytyak, Y. P.; Yakovyuk, I. V.; Tragniuk, O.; Komarova, T. V. & Shestopal, S. S. (2017). The State Sovereignty and Sovereign Rights: Correlation Problem. Man in India, 97(23), 577-588.

Cassirer, E. (1946). The Myth of the State. New Haven.

Chabod, F. (1962). L’idea di nazione. Bari. P. 146-155; D’Entreves A. The Notion of the State. Oxford, 1967.

Chiapelli, F. (1952). Studi di lingguaggio del Machiavelli. Firenze.

Civil code of the Russian Federation (1994). Part one. Federal law of 30.11.1994 No. 51-FZ. SZ Russian Federation. 1994. No. 32. Art. 3301).

Cole, M. (1997). Cultural and historical psychology: future science. Moscow.

Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (2006). Federal law of 13.06.1996 No. 63-FZ//SZ Russian Federation. 1996. No. 25. Art. 2954; The Federal law of 2.05.2006 No. 59-FZ "About an order of consideration of addresses of citizens of the Russian Federation"//SZ Russian Federation. 2006. No. 19. Art. 2060

Desmaze, Ch. A. (1867). Trésor judiciaire de la France. Curiosités des anciennes justices d’après leurs registres. Paris.

Dexter, G. (1955). Guillaume de La Perrière. Bibliotèque d’ Humanisme et Renaissance, 17(1), 56-73.

Dyuvernua, N. L. (2004). Readings on civil law. Moscow.

Fedoseyeva, S. V. (2009). Concept "official": ambiguity in interpretation. The Administrator of court, 1.

Foucault, M. (2011). Safety, territory, population. A course of lectures, read in the College de Frans in 1977-1978 academic year. St. Petersburg.

Grous, F. (1968). Litterature et mentalite medievale: Le roi et le people. Historica, 16, 22-25.

Hardy, G. (1928). Histoire de la colonization française. Paris.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1973). Aphorisms (Yensky period). Hegel G. W.F. Works of different years. In 2 t. T. 2. M, 536 C.

Howitt, A. W. (1904). The Native Tribes of South-East Australia. London.

Jelinek, G. (2004). The general doctrine about the state. St. Petersburg.

Kabo, V. R. (1986). Primitive pre-rural community. Moscow.

Kistyakovsky, B. A. (1998). The essence of the government. In Kistyakovsky B. A. Philosophy and sociology is right, (pp. 265-266). St. Petersburg.

Kreller, H. (1921). Lex Rhodia. Untersuchungen zur Quellengeschichte des romischen Seerechtes. Zeitschrift fur das Gesarnte Handelrecht und Konkursrecht, 25, 257-367.

La Perrière, G. de. (1555). Le Miroire politique œ vre non moins utile que necessaire á tous monarches, roys, seigneurs, magistrats, et autres surintendants et gouverneueurs de Respubliques. Lyon.

Land code of the Russian Federation (2001). Federal law of 25.10.2001 No. 136-FZ. SZ Russian Federation. 2001. No. 44. Art. 4147.

Levi-Bryul, L. (2002). Primitive mentality. St. Petersburg.

Levin, I. D. (2003). Sovereignty. St. Petersburg.

Lysikov, A. A. (2011). Development of the concept "official". Legality, 6.

Marshall, L. (1976). The! Kung of Nyae Nyae. Cambridge.

Mordovtsev, A. Y.; Mamychev, A. Y. & Shestopal, S. S. (2017). Essential content of Russian legal mentality. Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration, 6, 4(21).

Mordovtsev, A.; Zhinkin, S.; Mamychev, A.; Yakovyuk, I. & Shestopal, S. (2017). Legal Mentality in National Cultural Space: Characteristics of the ERA of Change (Church Schism of the 17th Century). Man in India, 97(23), 295-309.

Peterson, N. (1975). Hunter-Gatherer Territoriality: Perspective from Australia. American Anthropologist, 77(1).

Ross, A. (1960). On the Concepts "State" and "State Organs" in Constitutional Law. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 5, 123-124.

Russian Federation Code of Administrative Offences (2002). Federal law of 30.12.2001 No. 195-FZ. SZ Russian Federation. 2002. No. 1. P.1. Art. 1;

Schott, R. (1960). Religiöse und Sociale Bindungen des Eigentums bei Naturvölkern//Paideuma. Bd. 7. H. 3.

Sciacca, E. (1989). Forme di governo e forma della società nel Miroire Politique di Guillaume de La Perrière. Pensiere politico, 12, 174-197.

Seligmann, C. G. (1911). The Veddas. Cambridge.

Shestopal, S. S.; Lyubashits, V. Y.; Astakhov, V. V.; Pismennaya, E. E.; Ryazantsev, S. V.; Fedulov, A. M. & Barsukov, P. V. (2016). Features of Building Control Systems Sub-Locality in Modern Russia. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(1S), 78-83.

Sklovsky, K. I. (2002). Property in civil law. Prod. the 2nd. Moscow.

Socks, B. P. (2008). About some problems of administrative legal status of the official. The Government and local government, 9.

Tönnies, F. (2002). Community and society. Basic concepts of pure sociology. Moscow.

Tulviste, P. (1988). Historical Development of Thought. Soviet Psychology, 25.

Tyutryumov, M. I. (2004). Laws civil with explanations of the Ruling Senate and comments of the Russian lawyers. Comp. M. I. Tyutryumov. Book the second. Moscow.

Volkov, A. K. (2009). The constitution of the second empire in France, 1852 - 1870 Autoref. yew.... PhD in Law of St. Petersburg.

Vorontsov, S. A.; Mamychev, A. Y.; Ponedelkov, A. V.; Yanguzin, A. R. & Vildanov, H. (2017). Elitogenesis in the political processes of modern Russia, based on sociological (field) research. Man in India, 97(23), 273-284.

Vygotsky, L. S. & Luria, P. C. (1930). Etudes on behavior stories (a monkey, a primitive, the child). Moscow.

Weber, M. (1994). Favourites. Image of society. Moscow: Lawyer.

Weber, M. (1994). Favourites. Image of society. Moscow.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-30

How to Cite

Lyubashits, V. Y., Razuvaev, N. V., Mamychev, A. Y., Shestopal, S. S., & I., B. V. (2018). Signs of State and Their Historical Modifications. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 7(3), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v7i3.1746