Political Stability in Absence of Violence and Economic Growth in Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v7i5.1697Keywords:
Political stability, Absence of violence, Economic growth, Pakistan, ARDL.Abstract
This snapshot of political stability in absence of violence (POLIT) and economic growth (ECG) is analyzed in this study for period 1980-2016. The Ng-Perron is used to determine to order of integration. The findings shows that both series are integrated of order one. The short run impact of political stability in absence of violence on economic growth in Pakistan is determined by using VAR test and long term relationship is determined with help of Johansen Cointegration technique. This test point out that both series are integrated of order one. The impulse response functions show that there is a positive and significant short-run association between economic growth and political stability in absence of violence. Further, analysis Granger causality test showed that there was a unidirectional causality from POLIT to ECG. Policies that will assist in the control of violence and other regulatory measures are recommended to boost up economic growth in Pakistan.
References
Abranmovitz, M. (1990). Rapid growth potential and its realization: the experience of capitalist economist in postwar period. in Malinavud (ed), Economic growth and resources, London: Maccmillan, 27(3), 1-30.
Ahmed, M. M. (2005). Democracy Volatility and Development. Review of Economics Statistics 37(1), 87-98.
Alege, P. O. (2010). Are there any feasible anti-cyclical policies for Nigeria in the era of global economic crisis? Covenant Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 3, 25–50.
Alege, P. O. & Osabuohien, E. (2010). Globalization as a development model: Economic implications for Africa. Global Economic Analysis Conference, Bangkok, Thailand.
Alesina, A. & Roderik, D. (1991). Distributive policies and economic growth. CEPR Discussion paper, 565.
Bamoul, W. J. (1986). “Productivity growth, convergence and welfare: What the long run data show”, American Economic Review, 76(2), 1072-85.
Barro, R. J. (1996). “Democracy and Growth”, Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 1–27.
Barro, R. J. & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). “Economic growth and convergence across the United State”, NBER Working paper, 3419.
Feng, Y. (1997). Democracy, political stability and economic growth. British Journal of Political Science, 27(3), 391-418.
Feng, Yi. (2003). Democracy, Political Stability and Economic Growth. B. J. of PSC, 25(2), 11-39.
Jose, T. & Wacziarg, R. (2001). How Democracy Affects Growth, European Economic Review, 45(3), 37-41.
Nelson, M. A. & Ram, S. (1998). Democracy, Economic Freedom, Fiscal Policy and Growth in LDCs: A Fresh Look: Economic Development and Cultural Change Chicago, the University of Chicago, 13(2), 677-696.
Ng, S. & Perron, P. (2001). Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica, 69(6), 1519-1554.
Olson, M. (1982). The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. Yale University Press Political Science, 27(3), 391-418.
Przeworski, A. & Limongi, F. (1993). Political Regimes and Economic Growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(3), 51-69.
Roberto, R. & Rodrik, D. (2004). Rule of Law, Democracy, Openness, and Income. Estimating the Interrelationships. NBER Working Paper, 10750,
Tavares, J. & Romain, W. (1996). How Democracy Fosters Growth. Harvard University, 112-120.
Timothy, B. & Robin, B. (2001). Land Reform Poverty Reduction and Growth: Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 33-42.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All papers licensed under Creative Commons 4.0 CC-BY.- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.