Can BISP be used for Poverty Reduction?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v7i3.1643

Keywords:

Poverty, Poverty reduction, Poverty alleviation, Benazir income support program, BISP, Pakistan.

Abstract

The overall purpose of this research is to understand the dynamics of the social safety nets (Benazir Income Support Program, BISP) under the present circumstances of Pakistan, the role in the economy, the designing of the program and impact on poverty alleviation. The further the study evaluates if the program BISP has achieved its objectives and analyses its designing, payment mechanism, targeting techniques, the capacity and quality of the organization. This research implements a mix of qualitative and quantitative techniques. For the quantitative part, the researcher conducted a field study to collect data. The specific objectives of the study may be summarized as to make a thorough review of different social safety nets being run in different countries across the globe with special reference to Pakistan; to analyse the benefits of the program and to see how these could be maximized; and to find out the gaps in the current social safety net program (BISP) and to improve it through provisioning of policy measures and recommendations.

Author Biography

Shahzad Ahmad, National Defense University Islamabad

I am a PhD student at Department of Public Policy

References

Adams, L. & Kebede, E. (2005). Breaking the Poverty Cycle: A Case Study of Cash Interventions in Ethiopia. London: Humanitarian Policy Group

Ahmed, A. U. & Bouis, H. E. (2002). Weighing What’s Practical: Proxy Means Tests for Targeting Food subsidies in Egypt. Food Policy, 27, 519–540.

Alderman, H. (2002). Price and Tax Subsidization of Consumer Goods. Social Safety Net Primer Series. World Bank.

Barrett, C. B.; Holden, S. & Clay, D. C. (2004). Can Food-for-Work Programmes Reduce Vulnerability? Discussion Paper # D-07/2004. Department of Economics and Resource Management, Agricultural University of Norway.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973). Chapter 2, Article 38.

Heinrich, C. J. (2005). Demand and Supply Side Determinants in Conditional Cash Transfer Program Effectiveness: Improving the First Generation Programs. University of Wisconsin Madison. La Follette School of Public Affairs and Institute for Research on Poverty.

Hoffmann, C. H. (2005). Cash Transfer Programmes in Afghanistan: A Desk Review of Current Policy and Practice. London: ODI.

Irfan, M. (2003). Poverty and social safety nets: A Case study of Pakistan.

Jinnah, M. A. (1943, January). Speech presented at session of All India Muslim League, New Delhi.

PSLM Survey 2011 (2011). Federal Bureau of Statistics, Islamabad.

The World Bank (2009). Poverty Assessment Report.

The World Bank (2010). Country strategy paper Pakistan.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-30

How to Cite

Ahmad, S. (2018). Can BISP be used for Poverty Reduction?. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 7(3), 713-723. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v7i3.1643

Issue

Section

Workshops & Postgraduate Studies