Tarkovsky’s Philosophy of Love: Agape in Stalker and Sacrifice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v7i2.1490Keywords:
Andrei Tarkovksy, Tarkovsky, Agape, Stalker, Sacrifice, Love, Philosophy, Mysticism, Saint Paul, Zizek.Abstract
This article explores how the main characters in Tarkovsky’s movies Stalker and Sacrifice exhibit the Christian ideals of agape. With the New Testament, agape acquired metaphysical primacy and distinctive meaning as it came to be identified as originating from God and portraying a sacrificial act exemplified by the crucifixion of Jesus. Hence, agape necessarily entailed strong altruistic ethos and passionate commitment for the well being of others. Besides demonstrating the way in which Tarkovsky’s main heroes in Stalker and Sacrifice exhibit the ideals of agape while each going through their own unique “hero’s journey”, the article also seeks to unravel how Tarkovsky’s philosophy of love goes beyond mere “religious obstructionism”. Although Zizek argues that Tarkovsky’s ultimate message and solution to the ills of human existence is “religious obstructionism; that of self-sacrifice”, Tarkovsky’s philosophy of love provides much more complex and profound picture by entailing mystical characteristic and spiritual depth. Indeed, if one removes its metaphysical dimension, Tarkovsky’s philosophy of love may even align with the secular tempered existentialist and humanist tradition.
References
Abrahamov, B. (2011). Divine Love in Islamic Mysticism. New York: Routledge.
Armstrong, A. H. (1961). Platonic Eros and Christian Agape. The Downside Review.
Baglivo, D. (Director). (1984). A Poet in the Cinema [Video recording]. Italy.
Baglivo, D. (Director). (1984). Film is a Mosaic of Time [Video recording]. Italy.
Bello, M. L. (2014). Film Temporality -¬ a new form of experience? Reflections on Tarkovsky’s assertions on time. Euresis, 7, 87-99.
Bertrand, R. (1917). Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays. London, Great Britain: G. Allen & Unwin.
Bertrand, R. (1997). Religion and Science. Oxford, Great Britain: Oxford University Press.
Botz-Bornstein, T. & Stamatellos, G. (2018). Plotinus and the moving image. Leiden; Boston: Brill-Rodopi, 2018.
Brady, B. V. (2003). Christian love. Washington DC: Georgetown Univ Press.
Bray, P. (2017). The Hero-Journey, Hamlet and Positive Psychological Transformation. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1-31. doi.org/10.1177/0022167816689357
Campbell, J. (2004). The Hero with A Thousand Faces. New Jersey, United States: Princeton University Press.
D'Sa, N. S. (2016). Andrei Rublev: Religious Epiphany in Art. Journal of Religion & Film, 3(2).
Efird, R.O. (2014). The Holy Fool in Late Tarkovsky. Journal of Religion & Film, 18(1), Article 45.
Fanu, M. (1987). The cinema of Andrei Tarkovsky. London: British Film Institute.
Frankl, V. (1992). Man's Search for Meaning (4th ed.). Massachusetts, United States: Beacon Press Boston.
Fromm, E. & Funk, R. (1999). Love, sexuality, and matriarchy: about gender. New York, NY: Fromm International Pub.
Fromm, E. (1956). The Art of Loving: An Inquiry into the nature of love. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Gianvito, J. (2006). Andrei Tarkovsky: Interviews. Jackson, Mississippi: Universite Press of Mississippi.
Green, P. (1993). Andrei Tarkovsky: The Winding Quest. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hausdorff, D. (1972). Erich Fromm. New York, NY: Twayne.
Hill, R. P. (2002). Compassionate Love, Agape, and Altruism: A New Framework for Understanding and Supporting Impoverished Consumers. Journal of Macromarketing, 22(1), 19-31.
Huxley, A. (2009). The perennial philosophy. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.
James, W. (2017). The Varieties of Religious Experience. Lanham: Dancing Unicorn Books.
Johnson, V. & Graham, P. (1994). The Films of Andrei Tarkovsky: A Visual Fugue. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Lewis, C. (1960). The Four Loves. New York, NY: Harcourt & Brace.
May, R. (1969). Love and Will. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
May, R. (1999). Freedom and Destiny. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.
McLenachan, T. (2014). Truth is Stranger than Science Fiction: The Quest for Knowledge in Andrei Tarkovskii’s Solaris and Stalker. SLOVO, 26(2), 8-29. doi.org/10.14324/111.0954-6839.023
Nygren, A. (1953). Agape and Eros. Philadelphia: The westminister Press.
Pourtova, E. (2017). Andrei Tarkovsky: stalker of the unconscious. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 62(5), 778-786. doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12365
Robbins, B. (2015). The Heart of Humanistic Psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 56(3), 223-237. doi.org/10.1177/0022167815591408
Secomb, L. (2012). Philosophy and Love. Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.
Selig, J. (2015). Borne Forward Ceaselessly Into Love. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 56(3), 238-262. doi.org/10.1177/0022167815587847
Streiker L. D. (1964). The Christian Understanding of Platonic Love A Critique of Anders Nygren's "Agape and Eros". The Christian Scholar, 47(4), 331-340.
Tarkovsky, A. & Hunter-Blair, K. (1987). Sculpting in time. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
Tarkovsky, A. & Hunter-Blair, K. (2014). Time Within time. London, Great Britain: Verso.
Tarkovsky, A. (1987). Behind the Scenes on the Sacrifice [Television programme].
Tarnas, R. (2011). The passion of the Western mind. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Turovskaya, M. (1989). Tarkovsky: Cinema as Poetry. London, Great Britain: Faber & Faber.
Wagoner, R. (1997). The Meanings of Love. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers.
Wheeler, T. (2014). The Zone: James, Tarkovsky, and Understanding Reality. Cinesthesia, 4(1).
Wirzba, N. & Benson, B. (2008). Transforming philosophy and religion: Love’s Wisdom. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Zizek, S. (Writer). & Fiennes, S. (Director). (2006). Perverts Guide to Cinema [Television programme]. United Kingdom, Austria, Netherlands: Mischief Films, Amoeba Film.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All papers licensed under Creative Commons 4.0 CC-BY.- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.